ArticleScientific reports2022
An optimized method for purifying, detecting and quantifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis RNA from sputum for monitoring treatment response in TB patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Within-host pathogen population diversity predicts treatment response in Tuberculosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Beyond culturability: VBNC-like and differentially culturableFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Overexpression of outer membrane protein A (OmpA) increases aminoglycoside sensitivity in mycobacteria.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- A Bedaquiline, Pyrazinamide, Levofloxacin, Linezolid, and Clofazimine Second-line Regimen for Tuberculosis Displays Similar Early Bactericidal Activity as the Standard Rifampin-Based First-line Regimen.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Aerosolization of viableProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- New Insights into Biomarkers for Evaluating Therapy Efficacy in Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Narrative Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2023Review
- Performance of the MeltPro TB assay as initial test for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis with drug-resistance detection.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnostics that more accurately detect and quantify viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in the sputum of patients undergoing therapy are needed. Current culture- and molecular-based tests have shown limited efficacy for monitoring treatment response in TB patients, either due to the presence of viable sub-populations of Mtb which fail to grow under standard culture conditions (termed differentially detectable/culturable Mtb, DD Mtb) or the prolonged half-life of Mtb DNA in sputum. Here, we report an optimized RNA-based method for detecting and quantifying viable Mtb from patient sputum during the course of therapy. We first empirically derived a novel RNA extraction protocol from sputum that improves recovery of Mtb RNA while almost completely eliminating contamination from Mtb DNA and host nucleic acids. Next, we identified five Mtb 16S rRNA primer sets with varying limits of detection that were capable of distinguishing between live versus dead H37Rv Mtb. This combined protocol was then tested on sputa from a longitudinal cohort of patients receiving therapy for drug sensitive (DS) or drug resistant (DR) TB with first-line or second-line regimens, respectively. Results were compared with that of culture, including CFU, BACTEC MGIT, and a limiting dilution assay capable of detecting DD Mtb. The five 16S rRNA primer sets positively identified nearly all (range 94-100%) culture positive sputa, and a portion (19-37%) of culture negative sputa. In comparison, ten highly expressed Mtb mRNAs showed positivity in 72-86% of culture positive sputa, and in 0-13% of culture negative sputa. Two of the five 16S rRNA primer sets were able to positively identify 100% of culture positive sputa, and when tested on culture negative sputa from the DS cohort at 2 months post-initiation of therapy, identified 40% of samples as positive; a percentage that is in line with expected treatment failure rates when first-line therapy is discontinued early. These two primer sets also detected 16S rRNA in 13-20% of sputa at 6 months post-initiation of therapy in the DR cohort. Cycle threshold values for 16S rRNA showed a strong correlation with Mtb numbers as determined by culture (R > 0.87), including as Mtb numbers declined during the course of treatment with first-line and second-line regimens. The optimized molecular assay outlined here may have utility for monitoring treatment response in TB patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.