Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253296›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of emergency medicine2023

Incorporation of Serial 12-Lead Electrocardiogram With Machine Learning to Augment the Out-of-Hospital Diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Zeineb Bouzid, Ziad Faramand, Christian Martin-Gill, Susan M Sereika, Clifton W Callaway, Samir Saba, Richard Gregg, Fabio Badilini, Ervin Sejdic, Salah S Al-Zaiti

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Zeineb BouzidUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Ziad FaramandNortheast Georgia Health Systems, GA.
Christian Martin-GillUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Susan M SereikaUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Clifton W CallawayUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Samir SabaUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Richard GreggAdvanced Algorithm Research Center, Philips Healthcare, Cambridge, MA.
Fabio BadiliniUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Ervin SejdicUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Salah S Al-ZaitiUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: ssa33@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USNortheast Georgia Medical Center · USPhilips (Finland) · FIUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Electrocardiographic Detection of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Events for Accelerated Classification of Chest Pain Encounters (ECG-SMART 2)R01HL137761 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Salah S Al-Zaiti · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveIschemic electrocardiogram (ECG) changes are subtle and transient in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-acute coronary syndrome. However, the out-of-hospital ECG is not routinely used during subsequent evaluation at the emergency department. Therefore, we sought to compare the diagnostic performance of out-of-hospital and ED ECG and evaluate the incremental gain of artificial intelligence-augmented ECG analysis.

methodsThis prospective observational cohort study recruited patients with out-of-hospital chest pain. We retrieved out-of-hospital-ECG obtained by paramedics in the field and the first ED ECG obtained by nurses during inhospital evaluation. Two independent and blinded reviewers interpreted ECG dyads in mixed order per practice recommendations. Using 179 morphological ECG features, we trained, cross-validated, and tested a random forest classifier to augment non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis.

resultsOur sample included 2,122 patients (age 59 [16]; 53% women; 44% Black, 13.5% confirmed acute coronary syndrome). The rate of diagnostic ST elevation and ST depression were 5.9% and 16.2% on out-of-hospital-ECG and 6.1% and 12.4% on ED ECG, with ∼40% of changes seen on out-of-hospital-ECG persisting and ∼60% resolving. Using expert interpretation of out-of-hospital-ECG alone gave poor baseline performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC), sensitivity, and negative predictive values of 0.69, 0.50, and 0.92. Using expert interpretation of serial ECG changes enhanced this performance (AUC 0.80, sensitivity 0.61, and specificity 0.93). Interestingly, augmenting the out-of-hospital-ECG alone with artificial intelligence algorithms boosted its performance (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 0.75, and specificity 0.95), yielding a net reclassification improvement of 29.5% against expert ECG interpretation.

conclusionIn this study, 60% of diagnostic ST changes resolved prior to hospital arrival, making the ED ECG suboptimal for the inhospital evaluation of NSTE-ACS. Using serial ECG changes or incorporating artificial intelligence-augmented analyses would allow correctly reclassifying one in 4 patients with suspected NSTE-ACS.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeArtificial IntelligenceElectrocardiographyFemaleHospitalsHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36253296
PMCPMC9780162
OpenAlexW4306320340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.