Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253244›Full record

ReviewAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Adult acne versus adolescent acne: a narrative review with a focus on epidemiology to treatment.

Ömer Kutlu, Ayşe Serap Karadağ, Uwe Wollina

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Alterations in the lipid profile in acne vulgaris patients: A meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Safety and Clinical Efficacy of KūlarisClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Acne tarda: Recommendations for classification, treatment and care as a result of an expert discussion.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ömer KutluDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey. Electronic address: omerkutlu22@gmail.com.
Ayşe Serap KaradağDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Memorial Ataşehir Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Uwe WollinaDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Academic Teaching Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Istanbul Memorial Hospital · TRStädtisches Klinikum Dresden · DETokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acne vulgaris is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases and is characterized by papules, pustules, comedones, and nodules. Although adolescence is the preferential age group, acne may affect various age groups. Acne shares different properties in adults and adolescents. These differences extend from epidemiology to treatments. Increased awareness of these two subtypes will allow for better management of the disease. In this review, the authors examined all aspects of acne in adults and adolescents under the light of current literature.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisAdolescentAdultHumansAcne, adultAdolescent acne

Identifiers

PMID36253244
PMCPMC9837660
OpenAlexW4306253193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.