Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253111›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2023

GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study.

Taona Nyamapfene, Joanne Butterworth, Haider Merchant, Mike Eaton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Continuity of care and effective clinical experience overcoming medicolegal vulnerability.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Taona NyamapfeneUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter; Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-0457
Joanne ButterworthUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-3184
Haider MerchantRoyal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, Truro.ORCID 0000-0002-6432-3090
Mike EatonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-4633
University of Exeter · GBRoyal Cornwall Hospital Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough shared decision making (SDM) is key to delivering patient-centred care, there are barriers to GPs implementing SDM in practice. SDM training is undergoing development by organisations, including the Royal College of General Practitioners. However, GPs' perceptions of the delivery of SDM training in general practice remain largely unexplored.

aimTo explore GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in SDM training. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study of GPs with teaching roles at the University of Exeter Medical School.

methodPurposive sampling recruited 14 GPs. Semi-structured interviews explored their SDM educational experiences. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis.

resultsThree themes were identified. The GPs described role-play, receiving feedback, and on-the-job learning as modes of delivering SDM training that mostly informed their SDM in clinical practice positively. Learning from knowledgeable individuals and using realistic patient cases were perceived as beneficial components of SDM learning, although most learning occurred implicitly through reflections on their clinical experiences. The GPs identified that their training on SDM should reflect the uncertainty that is present when sharing decisions with patients in real-life general practice consultations. GPs also identified the targeting of individual GPs' SDM learning needs and explanation of the potential benefits of SDM on consultation outcomes as important methods to facilitate the implementation of SDM in practice.

conclusionTo the authors' knowledge, this is the first UK study to explore GPs' perceptions of SDM training and provide recommendations for practice. As SDM occurs in partnership with patients, further research should obtain and incorporate patients' views alongside those of GPs in the evaluation of future programmes.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision Making, SharedHumansQualitative Researchcontinuing professional developmentgeneral practicepostgraduate educationprimary health carequalitative researchshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID36253111
PMCPMC9591016
OpenAlexW4292289179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.