Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253084›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

How Does Literacy Affect Speech Processing? Not by Enhancing Cortical Responses to Speech, But by Promoting Connectivity of Acoustic-Phonetic and Graphomotor Cortices.

Alexis Hervais-Adelman, Uttam Kumar, Ramesh K Mishra, Vivek A Tripathi, Anupam Guleria, Jay P Singh, Falk Huettig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexis Hervais-AdelmanMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 6525 XD, The Netherlands alexis.hervais-adelman@uzh.ch.
Uttam KumarCentre of Biomedical Research, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ramesh K MishraUniversity of Hyderabad, Gachibowli 500046, Telangana, India.
Vivek A TripathiCentre for Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Allahabad, Old Katra 211002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anupam GuleriaCentre of Biomedical Research, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4158-2241
Jay P SinghCentre for Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Allahabad, Old Katra 211002, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-8124
Falk HuettigMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 6525 XD, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9135-4178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research suggests that literacy, specifically learning alphabetic letter-to-phoneme mappings, modifies online speech processing and enhances brain responses, as indexed by the BOLD, to speech in auditory areas associated with phonological processing (Dehaene et al., 2010). However, alphabets are not the only orthographic systems in use in the world, and hundreds of millions of individuals speak languages that are not written using alphabets. In order to make claims that literacy per se has broad and general consequences for brain responses to speech, one must seek confirmatory evidence from nonalphabetic literacy. To this end, we conducted a longitudinal fMRI study in India probing the effect of literacy in Devanagari, an abubgida, on functional connectivity and cerebral responses to speech in 91 variously literate Hindi-speaking male and female human participants. Twenty-two completely illiterate participants underwent 6 months of reading and writing training. Devanagari literacy increases functional connectivity between acoustic-phonetic and graphomotor brain areas, but we find no evidence that literacy changes brain responses to speech, either in cross-sectional or longitudinal analyses. These findings shows that a dramatic reconfiguration of the neurofunctional substrates of online speech processing may not be a universal result of learning to read, and suggest that the influence of writing on speech processing should also be investigated.

Indexed as

PhoneticsSpeechAcousticsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLiteracyMaleGMFAreadingspeech perceptionVWFAwriting

Identifiers

PMID36253084
PMCPMC9698677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.