Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36253078›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2023

A general method for calculating power for GEE analysis of complete and incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Ying Zhang, John S Preisser, Elizabeth L Turner, Paul J Rathouz, Mark Toles, Fan Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Model-robust standardization in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multilevel Intervention Stepped Wedge Designs (MLI-SWDs).Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ying ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-5672
John S PreisserDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Elizabeth L TurnerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7638-5942
Paul J RathouzDepartment of Population Health, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Mark TolesSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-1893

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Transitional Care for Skilled Nursing Facility Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and their Caregivers: a Cluster Randomized Trial.R01NR017636 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAURA C HANSON, Mark P Toles · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017636Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2019C1-16196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stepped wedge designs have uni-directional crossovers at randomly assigned time points (steps) where clusters switch from control to intervention condition. Incomplete stepped wedge designs are increasingly used in cluster randomized trials of health care interventions and have periods without data collection due to logistical, resource and patient-centered considerations. The development of sample size formulae for stepped wedge trials has primarily focused on complete designs and continuous responses. Addressing this gap, a general, fast, non-simulation based power procedure is proposed for generalized estimating equations analysis of complete and incomplete stepped wedge designs and its predicted power is compared to simulated power for binary and continuous responses. An extensive set of simulations for six and twelve clusters is based upon the Connect-Home trial with an incomplete stepped wedge design. Results show that empirical test size is well controlled using a t-test with bias-corrected sandwich variance estimator for as few as six clusters. Analytical power agrees well with a simulated power in scenarios with twelve clusters. For six clusters, analytical power is similar to simulated power with estimation using the correctly specified model-based variance estimator. To explore the impact of study design choice on power, the proposed fast GEE power method is applied to the Connect-Home trial design, four alternative incomplete stepped wedge designs and one complete design.

Indexed as

Research DesignBiasCluster AnalysisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample SizeCorrelated binary outcomescorrelation decayfinite-sample correctiongroup randomized trialintraclass correlation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.