ArticleBMJ open2022
Effect of structured rehabilitation versus non-structured rehabilitation following non-surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05302089 (The Effect of Rehabilitation Following Non-surgical Management of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Rehabilitation Following Non-surgical Management of Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-COVID-19 Rehabilitation Improves Mobility and Gait Performance: Evidence from TUG and 10MWT.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of therapeutic clinical trials for proximal humeral fractures.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAn increasing number of patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are being offered non-surgical treatment, including short immobilisation and structured rehabilitation. There are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing structured rehabilitation with non-structured rehabilitation to investigate the benefits of structured rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this RCT, patients with a displaced PHF will be assessed for eligibility at a Danish university outpatient clinic. Patients with competing injuries or patients offered surgery will be excluded, and randomisation will be 1:1. All patients will receive standard orthopaedic follow-up, including 14-day postinjury immobilisation, and advice about returning to activities of daily living before being allocated to structured rehabilitation in the municipalities or non-structured rehabilitation. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in the Oxford Shoulder Score (0-48 points, 48=best, minimal clinically important difference=10) at 6 months. A sample size of 60 patients will allow us to show a 10-point difference with 80% power. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Funded by Department of Orthopaedics, Zealand University Hospital (grant number N/A) and Region Zealand Health Science Research Foundation (R32-A1108-B14), 14 January 2022; The Ethics committee in Region Zealand approved (EMN-2022-02449), 8 April 2022. The site opened on 5 May 2022, and the final results will be updated on trial registries, submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, and inform rehabilitation strategies after displaced PHFs. Protocol version 1, 21 April 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05302089.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.