Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36252893›Full record

ArticleMicrobial pathogenesis2022

Nasopharyngeal microbiome of COVID-19 patients revealed a distinct bacterial profile in deceased and recovered individuals.

Dinesh Kumar, Ramesh Pandit, Sonal Sharma, Janvi Raval, Zarna Patel, Madhvi Joshi, Chaitanya G Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial pathogenesis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dinesh KumarGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of Gujarat, 6th Floor, MS Building, Gandhinagar, 382011, India.
Ramesh PanditGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of Gujarat, 6th Floor, MS Building, Gandhinagar, 382011, India.
Sonal SharmaGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of Gujarat, 6th Floor, MS Building, Gandhinagar, 382011, India.
Janvi RavalGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of Gujarat, 6th Floor, MS Building, Gandhinagar, 382011, India.
Zarna PatelGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of Gujarat, 6th Floor, MS Building, Gandhinagar, 382011, India.
Madhvi JoshiGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of Gujarat, 6th Floor, MS Building, Gandhinagar, 382011, India.
Chaitanya G JoshiGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre (GBRC), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of Gujarat, 6th Floor, MS Building, Gandhinagar, 382011, India. Electronic address: director@gbrc.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial co-infections in SARS-CoV-2 patients remained the least explored subject of clinical manifestations that may also determine the disease severity. Nasopharyngeal microbial community structure within SARS-CoV-2 infected patients could reveal interesting microbiome dynamics that may influence the disease outcomes. Here, in this research study, we analyzed distinct nasopharyngeal microbiome profile in the deceased (n = 48) and recovered (n = 29) COVID-19 patients and compared it with control SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals (control) (n = 33). The nasal microbiome composition of the three groups varies significantly (PERMANOVA, p-value <0.001), where deceased patients showed higher species richness compared to the recovered and control groups. Pathogenic genera, including Corynebacterium (LDA score 5.51), Staphylococcus, Serratia, Klebsiella and their corresponding species were determined as biomarkers (p-value <0.05, LDA cutoff 4.0) in the deceased COVID-19 patients. Ochrobactrum (LDA score 5.79), and Burkholderia (LDA 5.29), were found in the recovered group which harbors ordinal bacteria (p-value <0.05, LDA-4.0) as biomarkers. Similarly, Pseudomonas (LDA score 6.19), and several healthy nasal cavity commensals including Veillonella, and Porphyromonas, were biomarkers for the control individuals. Healthy commensal bacteria may trigger the immune response and alter the viral infection susceptibility and thus, may play important role and possible recovery that needs to be further explored. This research finding provide vital information and have significant implications for understanding the microbial diversity of COVID-19 patients. However, additional studies are needed to address the microbiome-based therapeutics and diagnostics interventions.

Indexed as

COVID-19MicrobiotaBacteriaHumansNasopharynxSARS-CoV-2And SARS-CoV-2Nasopharyngeal microbiomeOpportunistic pathogens

Identifiers

PMID36252893
PMCPMC9568276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.