Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36252826›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2022

Attentional biases in human anxiety.

Emilio A Valadez, Daniel S Pine, Nathan A Fox, Yair Bar-Haim

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Neural correlates of child temperament: The role of brain network connectivity in psychopathology risk.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Attention Bias in School-Age Children Who Stutter: Evidence From a Dot-Probe Task.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emilio A ValadezDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. Electronic address: evaladez@umd.edu.
Daniel S PineEmotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Nathan A FoxDepartment of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Yair Bar-HaimSchool of Psychological Sciences and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
University of Maryland, College Park · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USTel Aviv University · IL

Funding

Fmri Studies Of Risk For Mood And Anxiety Disorders In ChildrenZIAMH002782 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PINE, DANIEL · 2009 to 2025
$28.3M
Trajectories of Behavioral Inibition and Risk for AnxietyU01MH093349 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FOX, NATHAN A · 2011 to 2020
$6.6M
fMRI Study Of Risk Of Mood/Anxiety Disorders In ChildrenZ01MH002782 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PINE, DANIEL · 2002 to 2008
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH002782Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002782NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH093349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across clinical and subclinical samples, anxiety has been associated with increased attentional capture by cues signaling danger. Various cognitive models attribute the onset and maintenance of anxiety symptoms to maladaptive selective information processing. In this brief review, we 1) describe the evidence for the relations between anxiety and attention bias toward threat, 2) discuss the neurobiology of anxiety-related differences in threat bias, 3) summarize work investigating the developmental origins of attention bias toward threat, and 4) examine efforts to translate threat bias research into clinical intervention. Future directions in each area are discussed, including the use of novel analytic approaches improving characterization of threat-processing-related brain networks, clarifying the role of cognitive control in the development of attention bias toward threat, and the need for larger, well-controlled randomized clinical trials examining moderators and mediators of treatment response. Ultimately, this work has important implications for understanding the etiology of and for intervening on anxiety difficulties among children and adults.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersChildCognitionCuesHumansAmygdalaAnxietyAttention biasDevelopmentInterventionPrefrontal cortexTemperamentThreat

Identifiers

PMID36252826
PMCPMC9756271
OpenAlexW4306181913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.