ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022
Embryonic and extraembryonic tissues during mammalian development: shifting boundaries in time and space.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic Potential of Stem Cells in the Treatment and Management of Immunomodulatory Disorders.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Pooled it
- Genomic mosaicism in colorectal cancer and polyposis syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Pooled it
- TGFβ-activated PDHB promotes mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism and contributes to human endoderm differentiation via ATP-dependent BRG1.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Linking tissue morphology and tissue healing in a cell-fate model.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Deep-tissue transcriptomics and subcellular imaging at high spatial resolution.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Origin, fate and function of extraembryonic tissues during mammalian development.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025Review
- 3DMOUSEneST: a volumetric label-free imaging method evaluating embryo-uterine interaction and decidualization efficacy.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Evolution of Minimally Invasive and Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Extraembryonic tissues: exploring concepts, definitions and functions across the animal kingdom.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The first few days of embryonic development in eutherian mammals are dedicated to the specification and elaboration of the extraembryonic tissues. However, where the fetus ends and its adnexa begins is not always as self-evident during the early stages of development, when the definitive body axes are still being laid down, the germ layers being specified and a discrete form or bodyplan is yet to emerge. Function, anatomy, histomorphology and molecular identities have been used through the history of embryology, to make this distinction. In this review, we explore them individually by using specific examples from the early embryo. While highlighting the challenges of drawing discrete boundaries between embryonic and extraembryonic tissues and the limitations of a binary categorization, we discuss how basing such identity on fate is the most universal and conceptually consistent. This article is part of the theme issue 'Extraembryonic tissues: exploring concepts, definitions and functions across the animal kingdom'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.