Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36252177›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of managed care2022

Characteristics, utilization, and concentration of outpatient care for dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries.

Paula Chatterjee, Joshua M Liao, Erkuan Wang, Danielle Feffer, Amol S Navathe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of managed care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula ChatterjeePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Dr, Rm 1318, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Email: pchat@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Joshua M Liao
Erkuan Wang
Danielle Feffer
Amol S Navathe

Funding

Comparing the Impact of Voluntary and Mandatory Bundled Payments on Disparities in Surgical CareR01MD013859 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI IBRAHIM, SAID A, LIAO, JOSHUA M · 2019 to 2022
$2.2M
The effect of voluntary bundled payments on vulnerable populationsR01HS027595 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LIAO, JOSHUA M, NAVATHE, AMOL S · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
Improving Access to Care and Chronic Condition Management for Rural Older Adults in the USK23AG073512 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHATTERJEE, PAULA · 2021 to 2025
$818k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027595NIA NIH HHS K23 AG073512NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD013859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo characterize the (1) distribution of outpatient care for dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries ("duals") and (2) intensity of outpatient care utilization of duals vs non-dual-eligible beneficiaries ("nonduals"). STUDY

designUsing data preceding the introduction of several outpatient alternative payment models, as well as Medicaid expansion, we evaluated the distribution of outpatient care across physician practices using a Lorenz curve and compared utilization of different outpatient services between duals and nonduals.

methodsWe defined practices that did (high dual) and did not (low dual and no dual) account for the large majority of visits based on the Lorenz curve and then performed descriptive statistics between these groups of practices. Practice-level outcomes included patient demographics, practice characteristics, and county measures of structural disadvantage and population health. Patient-level outcomes included number of outpatient visits and unique outpatient physicians, primary vs subspecialty care visits, and expenditures.

resultsNearly 80% of outpatient visits for duals were provided by 35% of practices. Compared with low-dual and no-dual practices, high-dual practices served more patients (1117.6 patients per high-dual practice vs 683.8 patients per low-dual practice and 447.5 patients per no-dual practice; P < .001) with more comorbidities (3.9 mean total Elixhauser comorbidities among patients served by high-dual practices vs 3.6 among low-dual practices and 3.3 among no-dual practices; P < .001). With regard to utilization, duals had 2 fewer outpatient visits per year compared with nonduals (13.3 vs 15.2; P < .001), with particularly fewer subspecialty care visits (6.5 vs 7.9; P < .001) despite having more comorbidities (3.5 vs 2.7; P < .001).

conclusionsOutpatient care for duals was concentrated among a small number of practices. Despite having more chronic conditions, duals had fewer outpatient visits. Duals and the practices that serve them may benefit from targeted policies to promote access and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

MedicaidMedicareAgedAmbulatory CareChronic DiseaseHealth ExpendituresHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36252177
PMCPMC10084394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.