Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36252145›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine

Monitoring the effect of TNF-alpha inhibitors on laboratory parameters and adverse effects in different diseases: a retrospective, single-center study.

Abdulaziz N Madani, Fahad M Al-Saif, Lama R Alzamil, Aljohara M Almazroua, Nuha A Alfurayh, Sara D Aldokhayel, Qais A Almuhaideb, Nouf S Alballa, Nujud A Daham, Abdulrahman A Alkharashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdulaziz N MadaniFrom the Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7663-5115
Fahad M Al-SaifFrom the Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lama R AlzamilFrom the Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aljohara M AlmazrouaFrom the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nuha A AlfurayhFrom the Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sara D AldokhayelFrom the Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Qais A AlmuhaidebFrom the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nouf S AlballaFrom the Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nujud A DahamFrom the Department of Dermatology, Derma Cinics, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman A AlkharashiFrom the Department of Pharmacology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of biological treatments has revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Multiple clinical trials have established the efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, there are no clear indications for optimal monitoring intervals during treatment.

objectivesCollect and analyze laboratory evaluation data from patients receiving biological therapy to provide a better understanding of the need for laboratory investigations before and during treatment with biological agents, and to analyze adverse events and other factors.

designRetrospective cohort SETTINGS: Tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND

methodsData were collected from the electronic medical records of patients attending the dermatology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology clinics from June 2014 to June 2019. The laboratory parameters of patients who have received one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab) were collected starting at baseline and up to at least one year from treatment initiation.

main outcome measuresThe time points at which patients developed significantly abnormal laboratory results during treatment with one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors. SAMPLE SIZE: 250 patients

resultsMost patients were treated with adalimumab (38.4%); a similar proportion (38%) with infliximab, whereas only 23.6% were treated with etanercept. The majority of the significant abnormal laboratory results occurred at baseline, 3-6 and 9-12 months. Most abnormalities were among patients using infliximab, followed by etanercept, and then adalimumab. The median number of laboratory abnormalities for dermatology patients was significantly lower than that for gastroenterology patients (

conclusionsBecause dermatology patients showed a lower median number of laboratory abnormalities than patients treated by other specialties in our study, we believe that dermatology patients require less frequent laboratory monitoring. Therefore, we recommend laboratory evaluation at baseline, after 3-6 months, 1 year from the beginning of treatment, and annually thereafter for patients using TNF-alpha inhibitor agents. However, more frequent testing might be warranted according to patient comorbidities, concomitant medications, and physician judgment. LIMITATIONS: Single center and retrospective design. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsPsoriasisTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEtanerceptHumansInfliximabRetrospective StudiesAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsEtanerceptInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36252145
PMCPMC9557780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.