Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36252095›Full record

ReviewCirculation2022

Emerging Evidence on Coronary Heart Disease Screening in Kidney and Liver Transplantation Candidates: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the American Society of Transplantation.

Xingxing S Cheng, Lisa B VanWagner, Salvatore P Costa, David A Axelrod, Sripal Bangalore, Silas P Norman, Charles A Herzog, Krista L Lentine, American Heart Association Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. ASN Kidney Health Guidance on the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. New kidneys, old risks: cardiovascular challenges after transplantation.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xingxing S Cheng
Lisa B VanWagner
Salvatore P Costa
David A Axelrod
Sripal Bangalore
Silas P Norman
Charles A Herzog
Krista L Lentine
American Heart Association Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease and Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention

Funding

Refining repeat screening for coronary artery disease in kidney transplant candidatesK23DK123410 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHENG, XINGXING SHELLEY · 2020 to 2024
$826k
Implementation science to improve cardiovascular outcomes among liver transplant recipientsK23HL136891 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI VANWAGNER, LISA B · 2017 to 2020
$757k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL136891NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK123410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary heart disease is an important source of mortality and morbidity among kidney transplantation and liver transplantation candidates and recipients and is driven by traditional and nontraditional risk factors related to end-stage organ disease. In this scientific statement, we review evidence from the past decade related to coronary heart disease screening and management for kidney and liver transplantation candidates. Coronary heart disease screening in asymptomatic kidney and liver transplantation candidates has not been demonstrated to improve outcomes but is common in practice. Risk stratification algorithms based on the presence or absence of clinical risk factors and physical performance have been proposed, but a high proportion of candidates still meet criteria for screening tests. We suggest new approaches to pretransplantation evaluation grounded on the presence or absence of known coronary heart disease and cardiac symptoms and emphasize multidisciplinary engagement, including involvement of a dedicated cardiologist. Noninvasive functional screening methods such as stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy have limited accuracy, and newer noninvasive modalities, especially cardiac computed tomography-based tests, are promising alternatives. Emerging evidence such as results of the 2020 International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease trial emphasizes the vital importance of guideline-directed medical therapy in managing diagnosed coronary heart disease and further questions the value of revascularization among asymptomatic kidney transplantation candidates. Optimizing strategies to disseminate and implement best practices for medical management in the broader end-stage organ disease population should be prioritized to improve cardiovascular outcomes in these populations.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseMass ScreeningAmerican Heart AssociationClinical Trials as TopicHumansKidney TransplantationLiver TransplantationUnited StatesAHA Scientific Statementscoronary angiographycoronary diseaseexercise testkidney transplantationliver transplantationmass screeningmyocardial ischemiarisk evaluation and mitigationrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36252095
PMCPMC10124159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.