ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2022
Model of Processive Catalysis with Site Clustering and Blocking and Its Application to Cellulose Hydrolysis.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular mechanisms of processive glycoside hydrolases underline catalytic pragmatism.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactions between particles moving on a linear track and their possible blocking by obstacles can lead to crowding, impeding the particles' transport kinetics. When the particles are enzymes processively catalyzing a reaction along a linear polymeric substrate, these crowding and blocking effects may substantially reduce the overall catalytic rate. Cellulose hydrolysis by exocellulases processively moving along cellulose chains assembled into insoluble cellulose particles is an example of such a catalytic transport process. The details of the kinetics of cellulose hydrolysis and the causes of the often observed reduction of hydrolysis rate over time are not yet fully understood. Crowding and blocking of enzyme particles are thought to be one of the important factors affecting the cellulose hydrolysis, but its exact role and mechanism are not clear. Here, we introduce a simple model based on an elementary transport process that incorporates the crowding and blocking effects in a straightforward way. This is achieved by making a distinction between binding and non-binding sites on the chain. The model reproduces a range of experimental results, mainly related to the early phase of cellulose hydrolysis. Our results indicate that the combined effects of clustering of binding sites together with the occupancy pattern of these sites by the enzyme molecules play a decisive role in the overall kinetics of cellulose hydrolysis. It is suggested that periodic desorption and rebinding of enzyme molecules could be a basis of a strategy to partially counter the clustering of and blocking by the binding sites and so enhance the rate of cellulose hydrolysis. The general nature of the model means that it could be applicable also to other transport processes that make a distinction between binding and non-binding sites, where crowding and blocking are expected to be relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.