Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36251579›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Development and validation of a cost-effective virtual reality educational tool to reduce anxiety and improve set-up accuracy in radiotherapy patients.

Qianfeng Zhao, Bo Liu, Qiushi Sun, Yiqiang Jin

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Application of virtual reality for supportive care in cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qianfeng ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.
Bo LiuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.
Qiushi SunDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.
Yiqiang JinDepartment of Oncology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8544-4414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study proposes a cost-effective method for educating radiotherapy patients through an immersive virtual reality (VR) system.

methodsThe VR educational tool comprises VR glasses, a handheld controller, the scientific knowledge of radiotherapy, radiotherapy demonstration, and an audio introduction. To verify its efficacy, 120 radiotherapy patients with tumors were prospectively enrolled and divided into the control group or VR intervention group. After the first treatment, set-up errors, including three translation errors and three rotation errors, were recorded in six directions. In addition, participants were required to complete a questionnaire before radiotherapy to assess anxiety and understanding degrees. The questionnaire was scored using a five-point Likert Scale. Finally, Spearman's rank correlation test was used to evaluate set-up errors and questionnaire scores.

resultsThe set-up errors are significantly reduced in AP, SI, total translation, Roll and total rotation in the intervention group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). The scores are higher in the intervention group than in the control group in question 1 (2.1 ± 0.58 vs. 3.3 ± 0.55), question 2 (1.3 ± 0.44 vs. 2.5 ± 0.65), question 4 (2.2 ± 0.65 vs. 3.2 ± 0.82), question 5 (1.8 ± 0.59 vs. 3.1 ± 0.79), and all subscales (5.5 ± 1.2 vs. 8.9 ± 1.3 and 6.4 ± 1.3 vs. 9.2 ± 1.5). The scores of high, moderate, and low correlation are 47 (74%), 15 (23%), and 2 (3%) for the control group and 44 (69%), 17 (26%), and 3 (5%) for the intervention group, respectively.

conclusionThe VR educational tool can significantly improve comprehension and reduce anxiety. There is a strong correlation between set-up errors and questionnaire scores. The VR educational tool may help reduce set-up errors for radiotherapy patients.

Indexed as

AnxietyVirtual RealityAnxiety DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisEducational StatusHumanspatient educationradiotherapyset-up accuracyvirtual realityVR education

Identifiers

PMID36251579
PMCPMC10028029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read54
table measurements read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.