Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36251560›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2022

Clinical Features of Patients Hospitalized for All Routes of Anthrax, 1880-2018: A Systematic Review.

Katherine Hendricks, Marissa K Person, John S Bradley, Thitipong Mongkolrattanothai, Nathaniel Hupert, Peter Eichacker, Arthur M Friedlander, William A Bower

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Algorithms for the Identification of Anthrax Meningitis During a Mass Casualty Event Based on a Systematic Review of Systemic Anthrax From 1880 Through 2018.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review of Hospital Treatment Outcomes for Naturally Acquired and Bioterrorism-Related Anthrax, 1880-2018.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Case Series of Anthrax in Iran.Clinical case reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Central Nervous System Antimicrobial Exposure and Proposed Dosing for Anthrax Meningitis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Lysins as a powerful alternative to combat Bacillus anthracis.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. CDC Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Anthrax, 2023.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2023
    Article
  17. Anthrax outbreaks: an upcoming concern - commentary.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023
    Article
  18. Human Anthrax: Update of the Diagnosis and Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Welder's Anthrax: A Tale of 2 Cases.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine HendricksDivision of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Marissa K PersonDivision of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
John S BradleyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego and the University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, USA.
Thitipong MongkolrattanothaiDivision of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nathaniel HupertDepartments of Population Health Sciences and of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Peter EichackerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Arthur M FriedlanderUS Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
William A BowerDivision of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6538-8665
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

CDC HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthrax is a toxin-mediated zoonotic disease caused by Bacillus anthracis, with a worldwide distribution recognized for millennia. Bacillus anthracis is considered a potential biowarfare agent.

methodsWe completed a systematic review for clinical and demographic characteristics of adults and children hospitalized with anthrax (cutaneous, inhalation, ingestion, injection [from contaminated heroin], primary meningitis) abstracted from published case reports, case series, and line lists in English from 1880 through 2018, assessing treatment impact by type and severity of disease. We analyzed geographic distribution, route of infection, exposure to anthrax, and incubation period.

resultsData on 764 adults and 167 children were reviewed. Most cases reported for 1880 through 1915 were from Europe; those for 1916 through 1950 were from North America; and from 1951 on, cases were from Asia. Cutaneous was the most common form of anthrax for all populations. Since 1960, adult anthrax mortality has ranged from 31% for cutaneous to 90% for primary meningitis. Median incubation periods ranged from 1 day (interquartile range [IQR], 0-4) for injection to 7 days (IQR, 4-9) for inhalation anthrax. Most patients with inhalation anthrax developed pleural effusions and more than half with ingestion anthrax developed ascites. Treatment and critical care advances have improved survival for those with systemic symptoms, from approximately 30% in those untreated to approximately 70% in those receiving antimicrobials or antiserum/antitoxin.

conclusionsThis review provides an improved evidence base for both clinical care of individual anthrax patients and public health planning for wide-area aerosol releases of B. anthracis spores.

Indexed as

AnthraxAntitoxinsBacillus anthracisAdultAerosolsBiological Warfare AgentsChildHeroinHumansRespiratory Tract InfectionsAerosolsAntitoxinsBiological Warfare AgentsHeroinanthraxcutaneous anthraxingestion anthraxinhalation anthraxinjection anthrax

Identifiers

PMID36251560
PMCPMC9649428
OpenAlexW4306632890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.