ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2023
Language Accommodations for Limited English Proficient Patients in Rural Health Care.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual and in-person interpretation: a qualitative study from the perspective of professional medical interpreters.Family practice · 2026Article
- Evaluating LingualAI: a prospective validation of AI-based real-time translation against certified human interpreters.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Pakikisama: Filipino Patient Perspectives on Health Care Access and Utilization.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over 25 million individuals living in America are limited English proficient, many of whom live in rural communities. Adequate language accommodations are critical to providing effective healthcare for these populations. An online questionnaire was delivered to 42 rural facilities in Washington State. It included questions about their demand for language services, modalities of interpretation, translated documentation and barriers to providing accommodations. Fifteen of 42 (35.7%) responded. Spanish, Russian, Vietnamese, Japanese, Ukrainian and Mam were encountered daily. Telephonic and virtual remote interpreter services were the most widely available. Not all facilities had vital documents translated to frequently encountered languages. Challenges to providing language access were reported by nearly all participants. The rural facilities surveyed all encountered LEP patient populations and offered oral interpretation. Overall, these facilities were meeting requirements for providing language accommodation services. Even so, many facilities reported experiencing barriers to providing these services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36251203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.