Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36251115›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2023

Non-functioning pituitary microadenoma in children and adolescents: Is follow-up with diagnostic imaging necessary?

Camilla Borghammar, Ashkan Tamaddon, Eva-Marie Erfurth, Pia C Sundgren, Peter Siesjö, Maria Elfving, Margareta Nilsson

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camilla BorghammarSkåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Pediatric Endocrinology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. camilla.borghammar@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-4802
Ashkan TamaddonSkåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Eva-Marie ErfurthSkåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Endocrinology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pia C SundgrenSkåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Peter SiesjöSkåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosurgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Maria Elfving *Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Pediatric Endocrinology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Margareta Nilsson *Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

Barncancerfonden KF 2020-0002the Regional and Governmental Funds for Clinical Research FoU 2020-0306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNo consensus exists regarding follow-up recommendations for suspected pituitary microadenoma in children. To address this knowledge gap, we investigated the growth potential of pituitary solid and cystic lesions <10 mm in children and evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements.

methodsThe children included were <18 years at first pituitary MRI and radiologically diagnosed with a non-functioning microadenoma or cyst <10 mm. Lesion size at first and latest MRI as well as all individual MRI examinations were re-evaluated.

resultsIn total, 74 children, median age 12 years (range 3-17), had a non-functioning microadenoma, probable microadenoma, or cyst. Of these, 55 underwent repeated MRI (median 3, range 2-7) with a median follow-up of 37 months (range 4-189). None of the pituitary lesions without hormonal disturbances increased significantly during follow-up. Two radiologists agreed that no lesion could be identified in 38/269 (14%) MRI examinations, and in 51/231 (22%) they disagreed about lesion location. In 34/460 (7%) MRI measurements size differed >2 mm, which had been considered significant progression.

conclusionNon-functioning pituitary microadenoma in children has small size variations, often below the spatial resolution of the scanners. We suggest lesions <4 mm only for clinical follow-up, lesions 4-6 mm for MRI after 2 years and ≥7 mm MRI after 1 and 3 years, with clinical follow-up in between. If no progression, further MRI should only be performed after new clinical symptoms or hormonal disturbances.

Indexed as

AdenomaCystsPituitary NeoplasmsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingChildrenFollow-upMRIPituitary cystPituitary microadenoma

Identifiers

PMID36251115
OpenAlexW4306405319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.