ArticleCurrent microbiology2022
Genome-based Reclassification of Paraburkholderia insulsa as a Later Heterotypic Synonym of Paraburkholderia fungorum and Proposal of Paraburkholderia terrae subsp. terrae subsp. nov. and Paraburkholderia terrae subsp. steynii subsp. nov.
Article in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation list no. 231: valid publication of new names and new combinations effectively published outside theInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026Article
- Metabolism of Terephthalic Acid by a Novel Bacterial Consortium Produces Valuable By-Products.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Phenazines are involved in the antagonism of a novel subspecies of Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain S1Bt23 against Pythium ultimum.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Pectobacterium jejuense sp. nov. Isolated from Cucumber Stem Tissue.Current microbiology · 2023Article
- Genome-based taxonomy of Burkholderia sensu lato: Distinguishing closely related species.Genetics and molecular biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences similarity of > 99.8%, the phylogeny of 88 Paraburkholderia strains was reconstructed. Further, they were subjected to overall genome-related indices (OGRI), which resulted in the identification of distinct pairs of species that were closely related. A pair consist of the type strains of Paraburkholderia insulsa and Paraburkholderia fungorum possessed a dDDH value of 87.9%, correspondingly, and the average nucleotide identity (ANI) value was 98.5%. Based on the phylogenetic analysis, OGRI and phenotypical evidence, P. insulsa was proposed as a later heterotypic synonym of P. fungorum. Furthermore, a pair comprising type strains of Paraburkholderia terrae and Paraburkholderia steynii possessed dDDH and ANI values of 71.2% and 96.6%, respectively, and difference in phenotypic traits, which supports a subspecies proposal within these taxa. Thus, the recently described Paraburkholderia steynii was proposed into two subspecies namely Paraburkholderia terrae subsp terrae subsp. nov and as Paraburkholderia terrae subsp. steynii subsp. nov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.