Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36251075›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Arthroscopic-assisted robotic bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a pilot cadaveric study.

Andrea Fernandez, Elliot Sappey-Marinier, Frederic Lavoie, Cécile Batailler, Elvire Servien, Sébastien Lustig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea FernandezEmile Gallé Surgical Center, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France. a.fernandez@chru-nancy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-5615
Elliot Sappey-MarinierOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Frederic LavoieOrthopedic Surgery Department, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada.
Cécile BataillerOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Elvire ServienOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Sébastien LustigOrthopaedics Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CACentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough bicondylar arthroplasty showed great functional results, it encounters some difficulties to be performed routinely. On the other hand, arthroscopic techniques tend to replace open surgical techniques in sports medicine but strive to be developed in the field of arthroplasty. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a micro-invasive bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty using both arthroscopic and robotic technologies (A-BiUKA). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was conducted on complete fresh-frozen and embalmed cadaveric specimens. The main criterion of judgment was the successful positioning of trial implants through a minimal quad-sparing approach. Arthroscopy was used for bone-morphing and burring, supported by an image-free robotic system. Secondary criteria of judgment were axial deviation (measured using the navigation system), operating time, and incision length.

resultsTen A-BiUKA were performed. Implantation was successful in all cases. The mean preoperative frontal deviation was 179.8° ± 3.2 [175: 185], the mean postoperative frontal deviation was 178.5° ± 2.2 [175: 182], without any outliers. The mean correction was 1.7° ± 1.6 [0: 5]. Once the eight first A-UKA were performed, constituting the learning curve, the mean operative time for the remaining twelves surgeries was 90 min ± 6. The mean skin incision length was 3.35 cm ± 0.13 [3: 4].

conclusionAssociated arthroscopic and robotic technologies allows to perform Bi-UKA procedure using a quad sparing mini-invasive approach. Clinical prospective studies have to confirm the feasibility and the clinical outcomes of this surgery.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresCadaverHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArthroscopyKnee arthroplastyMini-invasive surgeryRoboticsUKA

Identifiers

PMID36251075
OpenAlexW4306377720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.