Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36251047›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2023

Fundamentals of HDX-MS.

Vanesa Vinciauskaite, Glenn R Masson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Histone Variant H2A.Z Enhances Histone and Nucleosome Dynamics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions in Structural Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025
    Review
  17. "Design principles of a membrane-spanning ubiquitin ligase".bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Target Engagement Assays in Early Drug Discovery.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  20. MultiPassMerger: Automated data processing for multipass cyclic ion mobility HDX-MS.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vanesa VinciauskaiteDivision of Cellular and Systems Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9226-1731
Glenn R MassonDivision of Cellular and Systems Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1386-4719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) is becoming part of the standard repertoire of techniques used by molecular biologists to investigate protein structure and dynamics. This is partly due to the increased use of automation in all stages of the technique and its versatility of application-many proteins that present challenges with techniques such as X-ray crystallography and cryoelectron microscopy are amenable to investigation with HDX-MS. The present review is aimed at scientists who are curious about the technique, and how it may aid their research. It describes the fundamental basis of solvent exchange, the basics of a standard HDX-MS experiment, as well as highlighting emerging novel experimental advances, which point to where the field is heading.

Indexed as

Deuterium Exchange MeasurementHydrogen Deuterium Exchange-Mass SpectrometryCryoelectron MicroscopyMass SpectrometryProteinsProteinsHDX-MSLC-MSmolecular interactions

Identifiers

PMID36251047
PMCPMC10070489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.