Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36251040›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Probiotics therapy for adults with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 RCTs.

Yan Wang, Nan Chen, Fangfen Niu, Yanfei Li, Kangle Guo, Xue Shang, Fenfen E, Chaoqun Yang, Kehu Yang, Xiuxia Li

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy and dose response ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Human intestinal microbiome: Role in health and disease.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan Wang *Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center & Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, 199 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Nan Chen *Research and Education Department, Shaanxi Provincial Rehabilitation Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Fangfen NiuFirst Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Yanfei LiEvidence-Based Social Science Research Center & Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, 199 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Kangle GuoGansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Xue ShangEvidence-Based Social Science Research Center & Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, 199 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Fenfen EEvidence-Based Social Science Research Center & Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, 199 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Chaoqun YangEvidence-Based Social Science Research Center & Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, 199 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Kehu YangEvidence-Based Social Science Research Center & Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, 199 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China. kehuyangebm2006@126.com.
Xiuxia LiEvidence-Based Social Science Research Center & Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, 199 Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, China. lixiuxia@lzu.edu.cn.
Lanzhou University · CNGansu Provincial Hospital · CNShaanxi Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities lzujbky-2021-ct06, lzujbky-2021-kb22the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82004203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccumulating evidence showed that probiotics therapy might be effective in treating diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of probiotics therapy for the treatment of IBS-D.

methodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search in eight electronic databases, and gray literature from inception to August 4, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics therapy for the treatment of IBS-D were included and the quality was assessed using the risk of bias tool recommended by the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0. RevMan 5.4 software was used to perform the meta-analysis on the outcomes of IBS-D symptoms, abdominal pain, quality of life, and abdominal distension. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

resultsTen RCTs evaluating 943 patients were identified. Only one study had unclear risk of bias, while nine studies had a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis results showed that, compared to the placebo, probiotics therapy significantly decreased the score of IBS-D symptoms (SMD =  - 0.55, 95% CI: [- 0.83, - 0.27], P < 0.05), abdominal pain (SMD =  - 0.43, 95% CI: [- 0.57, - 0.29], P < 0.05), and abdominal distension (SMD =  - 0.45, 95%CI: [- 0.81, - 0.09], P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the quality of life. However, all the certainty of evidence was very low.

conclusionVery low certainty evidence showed that probiotics might be an effective treatment for improving the IBS-D symptoms, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension, in adult IBS-D patients. However, these conclusions should be supported by high-quality evidence.

Indexed as

Irritable Bowel SyndromeProbioticsAbdominal PainAdultDiarrheaHumansTreatment OutcomeDiarrhea‐predominant irritable bowel syndromeProbioticsRandomized controlled trialsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36251040
OpenAlexW4306406942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.