Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250967›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2022

Experiences of co-designing research about a rural Aboriginal well-being program: Informing practice and policy.

Lisa Urquhart, Karen Roberts Dunghutti, Clinton Gibbs Muruwari, Karin Fisher, Leanne J Brown, Kerith Duncanson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa UrquhartDepartment of Rural Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-6742
Karen Roberts DunghuttiGalambila Aboriginal Health Service, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.
Clinton Gibbs MuruwariMid North Coast Local Health District, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.
Karin FisherDepartment of Rural Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-9648
Leanne J BrownDepartment of Rural Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4340-2320
Kerith DuncansonCentre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-6589
Coffs Harbour City Council · AUCentral Coast Local Health District · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUTamworth Hospital · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

Research Training Program Student Support Allocation, School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to explore data and Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal researchers' experiences and reflexivity in co-designing research about a rural Aboriginal well-being program to inform practice and policy.

settingGumbaynggirr, Birpai, Kamilaroi and Awabakal countries located in regional and rural New South Wales, Australia.

participantsRural and regionally located research team who co-designed processes to challenge the status quo about a critically framed, rural-based Aboriginal well-being research project.

designResearchers drew on data from a research project in an interpretive cycle of collaborative Yarning. Data included 90 published articles, 12 Yarning transcripts and 26 reflective journal text sets, as well as researcher experiences and reflexivity.

resultsThe Duguula Gayirray (Yarning together), Yandaarray (walking together) and Duguula Nguraljili (sharing together) co-design practice model was developed to represent key actions in the context of an Aboriginal well-being program in a rural context. Actions were supported by seven interpersonal ways of being and were underpinned by respectful relationships between community and researchers. DISCUSSION: Duguula Gayirray, Yandaarray and Duguula Nguraljili are critical to co-design practice and are grounded in respectful relationships. Our experiences led us to critique our perceptions of power sharing, equitable partnerships and collaborative knowledges towards opportunity for collective research co-design.

conclusionDuguula Gayirray, Yandaarray and Duguula Nguraljili transformed our understanding of achieving liberation from dominant western research in the context of a rurally located Australian Aboriginal well-being program. This study contributes to progression of Aboriginal health research practice and policy recommendations, enabling real cultural change in health care with rurally located Aboriginal communities.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesDelivery of Health CareHealth PromotionHumansNew South WalesProgram EvaluationAboriginal healthcollaborative inquirycritical hermeneuticsindigenous communitiesYarning

Identifiers

PMID36250967
PMCPMC10092418
OpenAlexW4306410152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.