ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
CEDA: integrating gene expression data with CRISPR-pooled screen data identifies essential genes with higher expression.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CAP-RNAseq: an integrated pipeline for functional annotation and prioritization of co-expression clusters.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationClustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genetic perturbation screen is a powerful tool to probe gene function. However, experimental noises, especially for the lowly expressed genes, need to be accounted for to maintain proper control of false positive rate.
methodsWe develop a statistical method, named CRISPR screen with Expression Data Analysis (CEDA), to integrate gene expression profiles and CRISPR screen data for identifying essential genes. CEDA stratifies genes based on expression level and adopts a three-component mixture model for the log-fold change of single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs). Empirical Bayesian prior and expectation-maximization algorithm are used for parameter estimation and false discovery rate inference.
resultsTaking advantage of gene expression data, CEDA identifies essential genes with higher expression. Compared to existing methods, CEDA shows comparable reliability but higher sensitivity in detecting essential genes with moderate sgRNA fold change. Therefore, using the same CRISPR data, CEDA generates an additional hit gene list. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.