Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250784›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

scGNN 2.0: a graph neural network tool for imputation and clustering of single-cell RNA-Seq data.

Haocheng Gu, Hao Cheng, Anjun Ma, Yang Li, Juexin Wang, Dong Xu, Qin Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haocheng GuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Hao ChengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Anjun MaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6269-398X
Yang LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Juexin WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-4310
Dong XuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Christopher S. Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4809-0514
Qin MaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3264-8392

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
TriState SenNET (Lung and Heart) Tissue Map and Atlas consortiumU54AG075931 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TOREN FINKEL, Melanie Koenigshoff · 2021 to 2026
$14.0M
Multi-view self-supervised deep learning for biological sequences and beyondR35GM126985 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI DONG XU · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NIA NIH HHS U54 AG075931NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126985NIH HHS R01-131399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGene expression imputation has been an essential step of the single-cell RNA-Seq data analysis workflow. Among several deep-learning methods, the debut of scGNN gained substantial recognition in 2021 for its superior performance and the ability to produce a cell-cell graph. However, the implementation of scGNN was relatively time-consuming and its performance could still be optimized.

resultsThe implementation of scGNN 2.0 is significantly faster than scGNN thanks to a simplified close-loop architecture. For all eight datasets, cell clustering performance was increased by 85.02% on average in terms of adjusted rand index, and the imputation Median L1 Error was reduced by 67.94% on average. With the built-in visualizations, users can quickly assess the imputation and cell clustering results, compare against benchmarks and interpret the cell-cell interaction. The expanded input and output formats also pave the way for custom workflows that integrate scGNN 2.0 with other scRNA-Seq toolkits on both Python and R platforms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: scGNN 2.0 is implemented in Python (as of version 3.8) with the source code available at https://github.com/OSU-BMBL/scGNN2.0. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisCluster AnalysisNeural Networks, ComputerRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID36250784
PMCPMC9710550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.