Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250651›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality

Improved FMEA Methods for Proactive Health Care Risk Assessment of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of COVID-19 Remote Patient Telemonitoring.

Chiara Parretti, Riccardo Tartaglia, Micaela La Regina, Francesco Venneri, Giovanni Sbrana, Massimo Mandò, Paul Barach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Analyzing and mitigating the risks of patient harm during operating room to intensive care unit patient handoffs.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Telemedicine in Italy, the starting point.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chiara ParrettiDepartment of Science Engineering, Marconi University, Italy.
Riccardo TartagliaDepartment of Science Engineering, Marconi University, Italy.
Micaela La ReginaClinical Risk Management, La Spezia Hospital, Italy.
Francesco VenneriHealth Trust USL-Centro Florence, Italy.
Giovanni SbranaDepartment of Eemergency, South East Tuscany Healtcare Agency, Italy.
Massimo MandòDepartment of Eemergency, South East Tuscany Healtcare Agency, Italy.
Paul BarachJefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the need to more effectively harness and leverage digital tools and technology for remote patient monitoring (RPM). RPM gained great popularity given the need to provide effective, safe, efficient, and remote patient care. RPM is based on noninvasive digital technologies aimed at improving the safety and efficiency of health care delivery. We report on an RPM program in which 200 COVID-19 patients were followed remotely to evaluate the effectiveness in treating and monitoring patients in home settings. We analyzed the inherent risks using mixed methods, including failure mode and effect analysis, a prospective, team-based risk management methodology structured to identify high-risk process system failures before they occur in telemonitoring of remote patients. The RPM saved lives and improved decision-making during the pandemic and helped prevent the health system's collapse. The failure mode and effect analysis-based assessment offers important insights and considerations for evaluating future RPM implementation and direction. RPM solutions are technically feasible, staff friendly, and can achieve high adherence rates. Rigorous and ongoing evaluation of devices and platforms is essential to clarifying their value and guiding national health and insurance health coverage decisions and adoption programs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID36250651
PMCPMC9622365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.