Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250614›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2023

Promoting and Maintaining Changes in Smoking Behavior for Patients Following Discharge from a Smoke-free Mental Health Inpatient Stay: Development of a Complex Intervention Using the Behavior Change Wheel.

Emily Shoesmith, Lisa Huddlestone, Jodi Pervin, Lion Shahab, Peter Coventry, Tim Coleman, Fabiana Lorencatto, Simon Gilbody, Moira Leahy, Michelle Horspool and 5 more

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Emily ShoesmithDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-4919
Lisa HuddlestoneDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
Jodi PervinDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
Lion ShahabDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4033-442X
Peter CoventryYork Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK.
Tim ColemanCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7303-4805
Fabiana LorencattoCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK.
Simon GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
Moira LeahyResearch and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Michelle HorspoolResearch and Development, Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Claire PaulResearch and Development, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
Lesley ColleyResearch and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton on Tees, UK.
Simon HoughIndependent Peer Researcher, Cheshire, UK.
Phil HoughIndependent Peer Researcher, Cheshire, UK.
Elena RatschenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
University of York · GBCheshire West and Chester · GBSheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBTees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK PRCRPG-Nov21\100002Department of Health NIHR200607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvidence suggests that smokers can successfully quit, remain abstinent or reduce smoking during a smoke-free mental health inpatient stay, provided behavioral/pharmacological support are offered. However, few evidence-based strategies to prevent the return to prehospital smoking behaviors post-discharge exist. AIMS AND

methodsWe report the development of an intervention designed to support smoking-related behavior change following discharge from a smoke-free mental health stay. We followed the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) intervention development process. The target behavior was supporting patients to change their smoking behaviors following discharge from a smoke-free mental health stay. Using systematic reviews, we identified the barriers and enablers, classified according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Potential intervention functions to address key influences were identified by consulting the BCW and Behavior Change Technique (BCT) taxonomy. Another systematic review identified effectiveness of BCTs in this context. Stakeholder consultations were conducted to prioritize and refine intervention content.

resultsBarriers and enablers to supporting smoking cessation were identified within the domains of environmental context and resources (lack of staff time); knowledge (ill-informed interactions about smoking); social influences, and intentions (lack of intention to deliver support). Potential strategies to address these influences included goal setting, problem-solving, feedback, social support, and information on health consequences. A strategy for operationalizing these techniques into intervention components was agreed upon: Pre-discharge evaluation sessions, a personalized resource folder, tailored behavioral and text message support post-discharge, and a peer interaction group, delivered by a trained mental health worker.

conclusionsThe intervention includes targeted resources to support smoking-related behavior change in patients following discharge from a smoke-free mental health setting. IMPLICATIONS: Using the BCW and TDF supported a theoretically and empirically informed process to define and develop a tailored intervention that acknowledges barriers and enablers to supporting smoking cessation in mental health settings. The result is a novel complex theory- and evidence-based intervention that will be formally tested in a randomized controlled feasibility study.

Indexed as

InpatientsMental HealthAftercareHumansPatient DischargeSmoking

Identifiers

PMID36250614
PMCPMC10032184
OpenAlexW4306406715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read6
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.