Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250435›Full record

ReviewCanadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes2023

Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI): Genesis and Future Directions.

Stephanie Nougaret, Yulia Lakhman, Suzan Bahadir, Elizabeth Sadowski, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Caroline Reinhold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie NougaretDepartment of Radiology, 90256Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Montpellier, France.
Yulia LakhmanDepartments of Radiology, 5803Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Suzan BahadirDepartment of Radiology, Baskent University, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0019-5851
Elizabeth SadowskiDepartments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public Health, 5232University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraService d'Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), 26930Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Caroline ReinholdDepartment of Radiology, 54473McGill University Health Center (MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-3273

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging plays an important role in characterizing and risk-stratifying commonly encountered adnexal lesions. Recently, the American College of Radiology (ACR) released the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) for ultrasound and subsequently for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The goal of the recently developed ACR O-RADS MRI risk stratification system is to improve the quality of imaging reports as well as the reproducibility of evaluating adnexal lesions on MRI. This review focuses on exploring this new system and its future refinements.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingOvaryFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographymagnetic resonance imagingovarian-adnexal reporting and data systemovarian cancerreportingultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36250435
PMCPMC11058407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.