Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250192›Full record

ArticleApplied cognitive psychology2022

False memories for true and false vaccination information form in line with pre-existing vaccine opinions.

Ciara M Greene, Constance de Saint Laurent, Karen Hegarty, Gillian Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied cognitive psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Proneness to false memory generation predicts pseudoscientific belief endorsement.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ciara M GreeneSchool of Psychology University College Dublin Dublin 4 Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8833-9046
Constance de Saint LaurentSchool of Psychology University College Dublin Dublin 4 Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2074-1765
Karen HegartySchool of Psychology University College Dublin Dublin 4 Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2823-0556
Gillian MurphySchool of Applied Psychology University College Cork Cork Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-139X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misinformation continually threatens efforts to control the COVID-19 pandemic, with vaccine misinformation now a key concern. False memories for misinformation can influence behavioural intentions, yet little is known about the factors affecting (false) memories for vaccine-related news items. Across two experiments (total

Indexed as

COVID‐19fake newsfalse memoriesmisinformationvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36250192
PMCPMC9537901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.