Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250186›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine international2022

Tissue-Welding Device: Considerable Advantages for Spleen Surgery Based on Histological and Cardiorespiratory Investigation.

Linda Gatiņa, Inga Piginka-Vjaceslavova, Dace Bērziņa, Maksims Zolovs

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda GatiņaPreclinical Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Kr. Helmana Street 8, Jelgava LV-3004, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4317-0598
Inga Piginka-VjaceslavovaPreclinical Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Kr. Helmana Street 8, Jelgava LV-3004, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-5444
Dace BērziņaPreclinical Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Kr. Helmana Street 8, Jelgava LV-3004, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1561-7524
Maksims ZolovsDepartment of Biosystematics, Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, Parades Street 1a, Daugavpils LV-5401, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-5869
Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies · LVDaugavpils University · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During splenic surgery, it is important to control blood loss and the potential risk of cardiac arrhythmia. The best way to prevent complications from surgery is to use the appropriate surgical devices; however, there is no guideline for the use of specific surgical devices for spleen incision. Therefore, the aim of this research was to compare the interactions of various surgical devices with spleen tissue, their cardiorespiratory effects during incision, and subsequent spleen surgical wound healing. A total of 75 rabbits were included in the study. CO

Identifiers

PMID36250186
PMCPMC9553717
OpenAlexW4297184961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.