Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250184›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2023

Classification of skin cancer from dermoscopic images using deep neural network architectures.

Jaisakthi S M, Mirunalini P, Chandrabose Aravindan, Rajagopal Appavu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaisakthi S MSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9136-1300
Mirunalini PDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Kalavakkam Chennai, India.
Chandrabose AravindanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Kalavakkam Chennai, India.
Rajagopal AppavuTaneja College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida Health-Tampa, Tampa, FL USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A powerful medical decision support system for classifying skin lesions from dermoscopic images is an important tool to prognosis of skin cancer. In the recent years, Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) have made a significant advancement in detecting skin cancer types from dermoscopic images, in-spite of its fine grained variability in its appearance. The main objective of this research work is to develop a DCNN based model to automatically classify skin cancer types into melanoma and non-melanoma with high accuracy. The datasets used in this work were obtained from the popular challenges ISIC-2019 and ISIC-2020, which have different image resolutions and class imbalance problems. To address these two problems and to achieve high performance in classification we have used EfficientNet architecture based on transfer learning techniques, which learns more complex and fine grained patterns from lesion images by automatically scaling depth, width and resolution of the network. We have augmented our dataset to overcome the class imbalance problem and also used metadata information to improve the classification results. Further to improve the efficiency of the EfficientNet we have used ranger optimizer which considerably reduces the hyper parameter tuning, which is required to achieve state-of-the-art results. We have conducted several experiments using different transferring models and our results proved that EfficientNet variants outperformed in the skin lesion classification tasks when compared with other architectures. The performance of the proposed system was evaluated using Area under the ROC curve (AUC - ROC) and obtained the score of 0.9681 by optimal fine tuning of EfficientNet-B6 with ranger optimizer.

Indexed as

Deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)Dermoscopic imagesEfficientNetMelanoma classification

Identifiers

PMID36250184
PMCPMC9554840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.