Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250176›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2022

Women in gastroenterology: the UK trainee experience.

Sonika Sethi, Aditi Kumar, Jennifer Clough, Srivathsan Ravindran, Rebecca Harris, Philip Harvey, Suneil Raju, Matthew James Brookes, Charlotte S Rutter, Helen Steed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gender disparity in gastroenterology: Time to focus on enablers than barriers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ensuring the Future Pool of Gastroenterologists in the United Kingdom Is Imperative.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sonika SethiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Aditi KumarDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1026-3173
Jennifer CloughGastroenterology, Guys & St Thomas NHS Trust, London, UK.
Srivathsan RavindranSt Mark's Academic Institute, London, UK.
Rebecca HarrisNIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Philip HarveyDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1192-9910
Suneil RajuAcademic Unit of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1162-9555
Matthew James BrookesDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Charlotte S RutterGastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1056-5841
Helen SteedDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Compared with other medical specialties, there are lower numbers of female trainees and lower rates of flexible working in gastroenterology. This study aims to examine the experience of male and female trainees to understand specialty demographics and the experience of training. Methods: Gastroenterology training data were obtained from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) trainee surveys from 2014, 2018 and 2020, and from the Royal College of Physicians Medical Workforce unit between 2011 and 2019. Data on endoscopy measures from 2011 to 2021 were obtained from the Joint Advisory Group (JAG) on gastrointestinal endoscopy, including the JAG Endoscopy training system and the National Endoscopy Database. Data were segregated and compared by gender. Results: The percentage of female gastroenterology trainees remains at around 40%, largely unchanged over the previous decade. From the BSG trainee survey, 29.5% of women have flexible working patterns compared with 2.6% of men (p<0.001), which is lower than other medical specialties. Less than half of female trainees felt confident about their job prospects once they qualify. A greater proportion of male than female trainees achieved provisional colonoscopy certification during training (55% vs 45%, p=0.005) and female trainees took longer to certify than male trainees (63 months vs 56 months, p=0.004). The total length of training time from primary medical qualification to consultancy was the same for men and women. Conclusion: Changes must be addressed from a national and institutional level to address equitable access to national training programmes and equality of outcome for male and female trainees.

Indexed as

colonoscopyendoscopic proceduresendoscopy

Identifiers

PMID36250176
PMCPMC9555141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.