ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2022
Women in gastroenterology: the UK trainee experience.
Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electronic Health Record Burden Among Gastroenterology Providers in a Large Tri-state Tertiary Referral Center.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Gender disparity in gastroenterology: Time to focus on enablers than barriers.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Gastroenterology Training and Career in Women: Challenges and Opportunities.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Review
- Discriminazione Basata sul Genere-Barriers Persist for Women Gastroenterologists in Italy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Gender disparity in hepatobiliary endoscopy training and delivery: Results of a nationwide survey.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Ensuring the Future Pool of Gastroenterologists in the United Kingdom Is Imperative.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Editorial: Women in gastrointestinal and hepatic pharmacology 2022.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Regional survey of foundation trainee doctors' views on a career in gastroenterology: implications for diversity and inclusion.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- UK ERCP sedation practices, patient comfort and endoscopist characteristics: National Endoscopy Database (NED) analysis on behalf of the JAG and BSG.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Compared with other medical specialties, there are lower numbers of female trainees and lower rates of flexible working in gastroenterology. This study aims to examine the experience of male and female trainees to understand specialty demographics and the experience of training. Methods: Gastroenterology training data were obtained from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) trainee surveys from 2014, 2018 and 2020, and from the Royal College of Physicians Medical Workforce unit between 2011 and 2019. Data on endoscopy measures from 2011 to 2021 were obtained from the Joint Advisory Group (JAG) on gastrointestinal endoscopy, including the JAG Endoscopy training system and the National Endoscopy Database. Data were segregated and compared by gender. Results: The percentage of female gastroenterology trainees remains at around 40%, largely unchanged over the previous decade. From the BSG trainee survey, 29.5% of women have flexible working patterns compared with 2.6% of men (p<0.001), which is lower than other medical specialties. Less than half of female trainees felt confident about their job prospects once they qualify. A greater proportion of male than female trainees achieved provisional colonoscopy certification during training (55% vs 45%, p=0.005) and female trainees took longer to certify than male trainees (63 months vs 56 months, p=0.004). The total length of training time from primary medical qualification to consultancy was the same for men and women. Conclusion: Changes must be addressed from a national and institutional level to address equitable access to national training programmes and equality of outcome for male and female trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.