ReviewReviews in aquaculture2022
Moving towards improved surveillance and earlier diagnosis of aquatic pathogens: From traditional methods to emerging technologies.
Review in Reviews in aquaculture, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- From traditional histopathology to virtual staining: deep learning approaches for assessing tissue lesions in farmed fish.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Rapid Culture-Independent Detection of Fish Pathogens Using Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Case-Based Insights Across Multiple Species and Tissues.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Addressing a Flat-Out Problem: Environmental DNA (eDNA) Exposes Silent Infestations ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Uncovering Putative Bacterial Pathogens in Lakes in Aotearoa New Zealand Using Environmental DNA.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Environmental DNA screening of Phocoenobacter atlanticus subsp. atlanticus in Atlantic salmon aquaculture.PloS one · 2026Article
- Direct LAMP for on-site rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) aquaculture water.PloS one · 2026Article
- Microbiome of wild oysters: assessing diversity and detecting potential pathogens using a metabarcoding approach.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Bacterial Isolates Associated with Mortality Events in Brown Trout (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Quantitative support for the benefits of proactive management for wildlife disease control.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Leveraging detection uncertainty to estimate Renibacterium salmoninarum infection status among multiple tissues and assays.PloS one · 2025Article
- Streamlined boiling lysis DNA extraction for Gram-positive aquaculture pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Updated roles of the gut microbiota in exploring shrimp etiology, polymicrobial pathogens, and disease incidence.Zoological research · 2024Review
- Recent advances in microfluidic-based spectroscopic approaches for pathogen detection.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- New prospects of environmental RNA metabarcoding research in biological diversity, ecotoxicological monitoring, and detection of COVID-19: a critical review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Review
- Assessing the transmission risk of red sea bream iridovirus (RSIV) in environmental water: insights from fish farms and experimental settings.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- A new Progressive Management Pathway for improving seaweed biosecurity.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Moving towards improved surveillance and earlier diagnosis of aquatic pathogens: From traditional methods to emerging technologies.Reviews in aquaculture · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate diagnosis is key to mitigating the impact of infectious diseases, along with efficient surveillance. This however is particularly challenging in aquatic environments due to hidden biodiversity and physical constraints. Traditional diagnostics, such as visual diagnosis and histopathology, are still widely used, but increasingly technological advances such as portable next generation sequencing (NGS) and artificial intelligence (AI) are being tested for early diagnosis. The most straightforward methodologies, based on visual diagnosis, rely on specialist knowledge and experience but provide a foundation for surveillance. Future computational remote sensing methods, such as AI image diagnosis and drone surveillance, will ultimately reduce labour costs whilst not compromising on sensitivity, but they require capital and infrastructural investment. Molecular techniques have advanced rapidly in the last 30 years, from standard PCR through loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) to NGS approaches, providing a range of technologies that support the currently popular eDNA diagnosis. There is now vast potential for transformative change driven by developments in human diagnostics. Here we compare current surveillance and diagnostic technologies with those that could be used or developed for use in the aquatic environment, against three gold standard ideals of high sensitivity, specificity, rapid diagnosis, and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.