Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250013›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Bacterial glycosylation, it's complicated.

Christine M Szymanski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cyanobacterium-Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Proteome-wide bioinformatic annotation and functional validation of the monotopic phosphoglycosyl transferase superfamily.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. More than one way to add a sugar into bacterial polysaccharides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Chemical biology tools to probe bacterial glycans.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine M SzymanskiDepartment of Microbiology and Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
University of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each microbe has the ability to produce a wide variety of sugar structures that includes some combination of glycolipids, glycoproteins, exopolysaccharides and oligosaccharides. For example, bacteria may synthesize lipooligosaccharides or lipopolysaccharides, teichoic and lipoteichoic acids, N- and O-linked glycoproteins, capsular polysaccharides, exopolysaccharides, poly-N-acetylglycosamine polymers, peptidoglycans, osmoregulated periplasmic glucans, trehalose or glycogen, just to name a few of the more broadly distributed carbohydrates that have been studied. The composition of many of these glycans are typically dissimilar from those described in eukaryotes, both in the seemingly endless repertoire of sugars that microbes are capable of synthesizing, and in the unique modifications that are attached to the carbohydrate residues. Furthermore, strain-to-strain differences in the carbohydrate building blocks used to create these glycoconjugates are the norm, and many strains possess additional mechanisms for turning on and off transferases that add specific monosaccharides and/or modifications, exponentially contributing to the structural heterogeneity observed by a single isolate, and preventing any structural generalization at the species level. In the past, a greater proportion of research effort was directed toward characterizing human pathogens rather than commensals or environmental isolates, and historically, the focus was on microbes that were simple to grow in large quantities and straightforward to genetically manipulate. These studies have revealed the complexity that exists among individual strains and have formed a foundation to better understand how other microbes, hosts and environments further transform the glycan composition of a single isolate. These studies also motivate researchers to further explore microbial glycan diversity, particularly as more sensitive analytical instruments and methods are developed to examine microbial populations

Indexed as

Campylobacter jejunicarbohydratesglycoconjugatesphase-variationpolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID36250013
PMCPMC9561416
OpenAlexW4298145096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.