Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36250006›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in intrinsically disordered proteins.

Ranran Chen, Xinlu Li, Yaqing Yang, Xixi Song, Cheng Wang, Dongdong Qiao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Glutamine-rich regions of the disordered CREB transactivation domain mediate dynamic intra- and intermolecular interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ranran ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xinlu LiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yaqing YangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xixi SongDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Cheng WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Dongdong QiaoShandong Mental Health Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) participate in many biological processes by interacting with other proteins, including the regulation of transcription, translation, and the cell cycle. With the increasing amount of disorder sequence data available, it is thus crucial to identify the IDP binding sites for functional annotation of these proteins. Over the decades, many computational approaches have been developed to predict protein-protein binding sites of IDP (IDP-PPIS) based on protein sequence information. Moreover, there are new IDP-PPIS predictors developed every year with the rapid development of artificial intelligence. It is thus necessary to provide an up-to-date overview of these methods in this field. In this paper, we collected 30 representative predictors published recently and summarized the databases, features and algorithms. We described the procedure how the features were generated based on public data and used for the prediction of IDP-PPIS, along with the methods to generate the feature representations. All the predictors were divided into three categories: scoring functions, machine learning-based prediction, and consensus approaches. For each category, we described the details of algorithms and their performances. Hopefully, our manuscript will not only provide a full picture of the status quo of IDP binding prediction, but also a guide for selecting different methods. More importantly, it will shed light on the inspirations for future development trends and principles.

Indexed as

intrinsically disordered protein (IDP)machine learningMLprotein functionsprotein interaction sites predictionprotein sequence

Identifiers

PMID36250006
PMCPMC9567019
OpenAlexW4298140661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.