ArticleAnimal reproduction
The life and death of the dominant follicle.
Article in Animal reproduction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of extending interval between presynchronization and breeding protocols and prostaglandin F2α administration before breeding protocol on reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows during summer.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Article
- Effects of phase-specific GnRH administration on ovarian functional markers, ovulation timing, and fertility in estrous-synchronized ewes.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Thyroid Hormones and Functional Ovarian Reserve: Systemic vs. Peripheral Dysfunctions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Induction of cystic ovarian follicles (COFs) in cattle by using an intrafollicular injection of indomethacin.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Much work has been conducted over the years to determine the major factors that control follicle growth, including the role of FSH, LH and IGF1. These factors permit the dominant follicle to grow while subordinate follicles regress. The dominant follicle enters a phase of growth, and then that growth slows as the follicle reaches maximum size. The dominant follicle remains morphologically larger for a few days in the static phase, before starting to regress with the loss of functional dominance. Few studies have addressed the factors that determine follicle fate during the static phase. In this review, we summarize the differences in gene expression between growing and non-growing (static or early regressing) dominant follicles, highlighting areas that require further study. Potential factors that may help survival of the dominant follicle include IGF1, estradiol and BMP4/BMP7, and intrafollicular factors that likely initiate regression and apoptosis include FGF18 and AMH acting through FASLG. It is also very likely that the influence of microRNAs, especially miR-21, play a role in determining the fate of the dominant follicle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.