Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249719›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied entomology = Zeitschrift fur angewandte Entomologie2022

Field margins and botanical insecticides enhance

Lawrence O Ochieng, Joshua O Ogendo, Philip K Bett, Jane G Nyaanga, Erick K Cheruiyot, Richard M S Mulwa, Sarah E J Arnold, Steven R Belmain, Philip C Stevenson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied entomology = Zeitschrift fur angewandte Entomologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. IntegratingHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Lablab (Frontiers in insect science · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Field margins and botanical insecticides enhanceJournal of applied entomology = Zeitschrift fur angewandte Entomologie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Lawrence O OchiengDepartment of Crops, Horticulture and Soils Egerton University Njoro Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7212-3841
Joshua O OgendoDepartment of Crops, Horticulture and Soils Egerton University Njoro Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-0246
Philip K BettDepartment of Biological Sciences Egerton University Njoro Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2887-9646
Jane G NyaangaDepartment of Crops, Horticulture and Soils Egerton University Njoro Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4082-8112
Erick K CheruiyotDepartment of Crops, Horticulture and Soils Egerton University Njoro Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2868-5972
Richard M S MulwaDepartment of Crops, Horticulture and Soils Egerton University Njoro Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7975-810X
Sarah E J ArnoldNatural Resources Institute University of Greenwich Chatham Maritime UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-0529
Steven R BelmainNatural Resources Institute University of Greenwich Chatham Maritime UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-7545
Philip C StevensonNatural Resources Institute University of Greenwich Chatham Maritime UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0736-3619
Egerton University · KENatural Resources Institute · GBRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botanical insecticides offer an environmentally benign insect pest management option for field crops with reduced impacts on natural enemies of pests and pollinators while botanically rich field margins can augment their abundance. Here, we evaluated the non-target effects on natural enemies and pest control efficacy on bean aphids in Lablab of three neem- and pyrethrum-based botanical insecticides (Pyerin75EC®, Nimbecidine® and Pyeneem 20EC®) and determine the influence of florally rich field margin vegetation on the recovery of beneficial insects after treatment. The botanical insecticides were applied at the early and late vegetative growth stages. Data were collected on aphids (abundance, damage severity and percent incidence) and natural enemy (abundance) both at pre-spraying and post-spraying alongside Lablab bean yield. The efficacy of botanical insecticides was similar to a synthetic pesticide control and reduced aphid abundance by 88% compared with the untreated control. However, the number of natural enemies was 34% higher in botanical insecticide-treated plots than in plots treated with synthetic insecticide indicating that plant-based treatments were less harmful to beneficial insects. The presence of field margin vegetation increased further the number of parasitic wasps and tachinid flies by 16% and 20%, respectively. This indicated that non-crop habitats can enhance recovery in beneficial insect populations and that botanical insecticides integrate effectively with conservation biological control strategies. Higher grain yields of 2.55-3.04 and 2.95-3.23 t/ha were recorded for both botanical insecticide and synthetic insecticide in the presence of florally enhanced field margins in consecutive cropping seasons. Overall, these data demonstrated that commercial botanical insecticides together with florally rich field margins offer an integrated, environmentally benign and sustainable alternative to synthetic insecticides for insect pest management and increased productivity of the orphan crop legume, Lablab.

Indexed as

botanical insecticidesconservation biological controlfield marginintegrated pest managementlegume cropping systems

Identifiers

PMID36249719
PMCPMC9545213
OpenAlexW4293150294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.