ArticleOphthalmology science2022
Improved Training Efficiency for Retinopathy of Prematurity Deep Learning Models Using Comparison versus Class Labels.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning applications for diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity diseases diagnosis: a systematic review.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and efficiency of training neural networks for medical image classification using comparison labels indicating relative disease severity versus diagnostic class labels from a retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) image dataset. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Participants: Deep learning neural networks trained on expert-labeled wide-angle retinal images obtained from patients undergoing diagnostic ROP examinations obtained as part of the Imaging and Informatics in ROP (i-ROP) cohort study. Methods: Neural networks were trained with either class or comparison labels indicating plus disease severity in ROP retinal fundus images from 2 datasets. After training and validation, all networks underwent evaluation using a separate test dataset in 1 of 2 binary classification tasks: normal versus abnormal or plus versus nonplus. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were measured to assess network performance. Results: Given the same number of labels, neural networks learned more efficiently by comparison, generating significantly higher AUCs in both classification tasks across both datasets. Similarly, given the same number of images, comparison learning developed networks with significantly higher AUCs across both classification tasks in 1 of 2 datasets. The difference in efficiency and accuracy between models trained on either label type decreased as the size of the training set increased. Conclusions: Comparison labels individually are more informative and more abundant per sample than class labels. These findings indicate a potential means of overcoming the common obstacle of data variability and scarcity when training neural networks for medical image classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.