Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249697›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2022

Deep Learning-Based Cataract Detection and Grading from Slit-Lamp and Retro-Illumination Photographs: Model Development and Validation Study.

Ki Young Son, Jongwoo Ko, Eunseok Kim, Si Young Lee, Min-Ji Kim, Jisang Han, Eunhae Shin, Tae-Young Chung, Dong Hui Lim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development of the AI Pipeline for Corneal Opacity Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ki Young SonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jongwoo KoGraduate School of Artificial Intelligence, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Eunseok KimDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Si Young LeeSamsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min-Ji KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jisang HanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Eunhae ShinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Young ChungDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hui LimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Samsung (South Korea) · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate an automated deep learning (DL)-based artificial intelligence (AI) platform for diagnosing and grading cataracts using slit-lamp and retroillumination lens photographs based on the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III. Design: Cross-sectional study in which a convolutional neural network was trained and tested using photographs of slit-lamp and retroillumination lens photographs. Participants: One thousand three hundred thirty-five slit-lamp images and 637 retroillumination lens images from 596 patients. Methods: Slit-lamp and retroillumination lens photographs were graded by 2 trained graders using LOCS III. Image datasets were labeled and divided into training, validation, and test datasets. We trained and validated AI platforms with 4 key strategies in the AI domain: (1) region detection network for redundant information inside data, (2) data augmentation and transfer learning for the small dataset size problem, (3) generalized cross-entropy loss for dataset bias, and (4) class balanced loss for class imbalance problems. The performance of the AI platform was reinforced with an ensemble of 3 AI algorithms: ResNet18, WideResNet50-2, and ResNext50. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic and LOCS III-based grading prediction performance of AI platforms. Results: The AI platform showed robust diagnostic performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.9992 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9986-0.9998] and 0.9994 [95% CI, 0.9989-0.9998]; accuracy, 98.82% [95% CI, 97.7%-99.9%] and 98.51% [95% CI, 97.4%-99.6%]) and LOCS III-based grading prediction performance (AUC, 0.9567 [95% CI, 0.9501-0.9633] and 0.9650 [95% CI, 0.9509-0.9792]; accuracy, 91.22% [95% CI, 89.4%-93.0%] and 90.26% [95% CI, 88.6%-91.9%]) for nuclear opalescence (NO) and nuclear color (NC) using slit-lamp photographs, respectively. For cortical opacity (CO) and posterior subcapsular opacity (PSC), the system achieved high diagnostic performance (AUC, 0.9680 [95% CI, 0.9579-0.9781] and 0.9465 [95% CI, 0.9348-0.9582]; accuracy, 96.21% [95% CI, 94.4%-98.0%] and 92.17% [95% CI, 88.6%-95.8%]) and good LOCS III-based grading prediction performance (AUC, 0.9044 [95% CI, 0.8958-0.9129] and 0.9174 [95% CI, 0.9055-0.9295]; accuracy, 91.33% [95% CI, 89.7%-93.0%] and 87.89% [95% CI, 85.6%-90.2%]) using retroillumination images. Conclusions: Our DL-based AI platform successfully yielded accurate and precise detection and grading of NO and NC in 7-level classification and CO and PSC in 6-level classification, overcoming the limitations of medical databases such as few training data or biased label distribution.

Indexed as

AI, artificial intelligenceArtificial intelligenceAUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curveBCVA, best-corrected visual acuityCataractCB, class-balancedCI, confidence intervalCNN, convolutional neural networkCO, cortical opacityDeep learningDL, deep learningFN, false negativeFP, false positiveGCE, generalized cross-entropyGrad-CAM, gradient-weighted class activation mappingLens Opacities Classification System IIILOCS, Lens Opacities Classification SystemNC, nuclear colorNO, nuclear opalescencePSC, posterior subcapsular opacityRDN, region detection networkTN, true negativeTP, true positive

Identifiers

PMID36249697
PMCPMC9559082
OpenAlexW4220751870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.