Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249690›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2022

Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting Glaucoma Progression Using Electronic Health Records and Natural Language Processing.

Sophia Y Wang, Benjamin Tseng, Tina Hernandez-Boussard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophia Y WangByers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Benjamin TsengByers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TIRIN MOORE · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Personalized Predictions for Glaucoma Progression Using Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Health RecordsK23EY032635 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SOPHIA YING · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Advances in artificial intelligence have produced a few predictive models in glaucoma, including a logistic regression model predicting glaucoma progression to surgery. However, uncertainty exists regarding how to integrate the wealth of information in free-text clinical notes. The purpose of this study was to predict glaucoma progression requiring surgery using deep learning (DL) approaches on data from electronic health records (EHRs), including features from structured clinical data and from natural language processing of clinical free-text notes. Design: Development of DL predictive model in an observational cohort. Participants: Adult patients with glaucoma at a single center treated from 2008 through 2020. Methods: Ophthalmology clinical notes of patients with glaucoma were identified from EHRs. Available structured data included patient demographic information, diagnosis codes, prior surgeries, and clinical information including intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and central corneal thickness. In addition, words from patients' first 120 days of notes were mapped to ophthalmology domain-specific neural word embeddings trained on PubMed ophthalmology abstracts. Word embeddings and structured clinical data were used as inputs to DL models to predict subsequent glaucoma surgery. Main Outcome Measures: Evaluation metrics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and F1 score, the harmonic mean of positive predictive value, and sensitivity on a held-out test set. Results: Seven hundred forty-eight of 4512 patients with glaucoma underwent surgery. The model that incorporated both structured clinical features as well as input features from clinical notes achieved an AUC of 73% and F1 of 40%, compared with only structured clinical features, (AUC, 66%; F1, 34%) and only clinical free-text features (AUC, 70%; F1, 42%). All models outperformed predictions from a glaucoma specialist's review of clinical notes (F1, 29.5%). Conclusions: We can successfully predict which patients with glaucoma will need surgery using DL models on EHRs unstructured text. Models incorporating free-text data outperformed those using only structured inputs. Future predictive models using EHRs should make use of information from within clinical free-text notes to improve predictive performance. Additional research is needed to investigate optimal methods of incorporating imaging data into future predictive models as well.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curveDeep LearningDL, deep learningEHR, electronic health recordGlaucomaInformaticsIOP, intraocular pressure

Identifiers

PMID36249690
PMCPMC9559076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.