ArticleOphthalmology science2022
Alterations in the Choroidal Sublayers in Relationship to Severity and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Swept-Source OCT Study.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Effects of Intravitreal Ranibizumab Compared With Panretinal Photocoagulation on Optical Coherence Tomography Measured Choroidal Thickness and Vascularity.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Trial
- Diabetic retinopathy: why some eyes suffer more - a focus on retina-specific risk factors and metabolic memory.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical and optical coherence tomography predictors of spontaneous resolution of diabetic macular edema: incremental value of the subfoveal large choroidal vessel layer thickness ratio.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Role of Diabetic Choroidopathy in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Global trends and performances in diabetic retinopathy studies: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the association of baseline choroidal sublayers metrics with the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression over 2 years, with adjustment for confounding factors that affect choroidal measurements. Design: Prospective, observational cohort study. Participants: One hundred three eyes from 62 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: Patients were followed up at 6-month intervals for at least 2 years. Choroidal metrics including choroidal area, choroidal thickness (CT), and choroidal vascularity index were measured for both (1) the choriocapillaris plus Sattler's layer and (2) the Haller's layer within the subfoveal and parafoveal region. Cox proportional models were constructed to estimate the relationship between baseline choroidal metrics and DR progression, adjusted for intereye correlation, established risk factors (i.e., duration of DM, glycated hemoglobin [HbA Main Outcome Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) calculated by Cox proportional hazards model to demonstrate the associations between baseline choroidal metrics and DR progression. Results: After adjusting for age, axial length, and intereye correlation, choroidal metrics in Haller's layer at baseline that were associated with a higher risk of DR progression included increases in subfoveal choroidal area (HR, 2.033; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.179-3.505; Conclusions: Eyes with a larger choroidal area and CT in Haller's layer at baseline were associated with a higher risk of DR progression over 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.