ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2022
Robotic Autonomy for Magnetic Endoscope Biopsy.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cooperative integrated surgical robots for high-performance targeted therapies.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- A soft robotic "Add-on" for colonoscopy: increasing safety and comfort through force monitoring.npj Robotics · 2025Article
- A multifunctional soft robot for cardiac interventions.Science advances · 2023Article
- Active Stabilization of Interventional Tasks Utilizing a Magnetically Manipulated Endoscope.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetically actuated endoscopes are currently transitioning in to clinical use for procedures such as colonoscopy, presenting numerous benefits over their conventional counterparts. Intelligent and easy-to-use control strategies are an essential part of their clinical effectiveness due to the un-intuitive nature of magnetic field interaction. However, work on developing intelligent control for these devices has mainly been focused on general purpose endoscope navigation. In this work, we investigate the use of autonomous robotic control for magnetic colonoscope intervention via biopsy, another major component of clinical viability. We have developed control strategies with varying levels of robotic autonomy, including semi-autonomous routines for identifying and performing targeted biopsy, as well as random quadrant biopsy. We present and compare the performance of these approaches to magnetic endoscope biopsy against the use of a standard flexible endoscope on bench-top using a colonoscopy training simulator and silicone colon model. The semi-autonomous routines for targeted and random quadrant biopsy were shown to reduce user workload with comparable times to using a standard flexible endoscope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.