Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249546›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of social issues2022

Intergenerational programming during the pandemic: Transformation during (constantly) changing times.

Shannon E Jarrott, Skye N Leedahl, Tamar E Shovali, Carson De Fries, Amy DelPo, Erica Estus, Caroline Gangji, Leslie Hasche, Jill Juris, Roddy MacInnes and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of social issues, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Healthy Me, Healthy Planet: Evaluation of a pilot planetary health library program.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intergenerational contact during and beyond COVID-19.The Journal of social issues · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shannon E JarrottSocial Work, Ohio State University (Lead author and Case Study 4 contact) Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0612-4245
Skye N LeedahlHuman Development and Family Science University of Rhode Island (Case Study 2 contact) Kingston Rhode Island USA.
Tamar E ShovaliHuman Development Eckerd College (Case Study 3 contact) St. Petersburg Florida USA.
Carson De FriesSocial Work University of Denver (Case Study 1 contact) Denver Colorado USA.
Amy DelPoDenver Public Library Denver Colorado USA.
Erica EstusCollege of Pharmacy University of Rhode Island Kingston Rhode Island USA.
Caroline GangjiThe Village Common of Rhode Island & formerly Age-Friendly Rhode Island Providence Rhode Island USA.
Leslie HascheSocial Work University of Denver (Case Study 1 contact) Denver Colorado USA.
Jill JurisRecreation Management and Physical Education Appalachian State University Boone North Carolina USA.
Roddy MacInnesCollege of Arts Humanities, and Social Sciences at the University of Denver Denver Colorado USA.
Matthew SchilzSocial Work University of Denver (Case Study 1 contact) Denver Colorado USA.
Rachel M ScrivanoSocial Work, Ohio State University (Lead author and Case Study 4 contact) Columbus Ohio USA.
Andrew StewardSocial Work University of Denver (Case Study 1 contact) Denver Colorado USA.
Catherine TaylorAARP Rhode Island & formerly Age-Friendly Rhode Island Kingston Rhode Island USA.
Anne WalkerCollege of Arts Humanities, and Social Sciences at the University of Denver Denver Colorado USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intergenerational programs have long been employed to reduce ageism and optimize youth and older adult development. Most involve in-person meetings, which COVID-19 arrested. ​​Needs for safety and social contact were amplified during COVID-19, leading to modified programming that engaged generations remotely rather than eliminating it. Our collective case study incorporates four intergenerational programs in five US states prior to and during COVID-19. Each aims to reduce ageism, incorporating nutrition education, technology skills, or photography programming. Authors present case goals, participants, implementation methods, including responses to COVID-19, outcomes, and lessons learned. Technology afforded opportunities for intergenerational connections; non-technological methods also were employed. Across cases, programmatic foci were maintained through adaptive programming. Community partners' awareness of immediate needs facilitated responsive programming with universities, who leveraged unique resources. While new methods and partnerships will continue post-pandemic, authors concurred that virtual contact cannot fully substitute for in-person relationship-building. Remote programming maintained ties between groups ready to resume shared in-person programming as soon as possible; they now have tested means for responding to routine or novel cancellations of in-person programming. Able to implement in-person and remote intergenerational programming, communities can fight ageism and pursue diverse goals regardless of health, transportation, weather, or other restrictions.

Identifiers

PMID36249546
PMCPMC9537804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.