Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249495›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2022

The Scatman: an approximate method for fast wide-angle scattering simulations.

Alessandro Colombo, Julian Zimmermann, Bruno Langbehn, Thomas Möller, Christian Peltz, Katharina Sander, Björn Kruse, Paul Tümmler, Ingo Barke, Daniela Rupp and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alessandro ColomboLaboratory for Solid State Physics, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7950-293X
Julian ZimmermannLaboratory for Solid State Physics, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-1013
Bruno LangbehnInstitute for Optics and Atomic Physics, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-8169
Thomas MöllerInstitute for Optics and Atomic Physics, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Christian PeltzInstitute for Physics, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-7488
Katharina SanderInstitute for Physics, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Björn KruseInstitute for Physics, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-1972
Paul TümmlerInstitute for Physics, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Ingo BarkeInstitute for Physics, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Daniela RuppLaboratory for Solid State Physics, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Thomas FennelInstitute for Physics, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-shot coherent diffraction imaging (CDI) is a powerful approach to characterize the structure and dynamics of isolated nanoscale objects such as single viruses, aerosols, nanocrystals and droplets. Using X-ray wavelengths, the diffraction images in CDI experiments usually cover only small scattering angles of a few degrees. These small-angle patterns represent the magnitude of the Fourier transform of the 2D projection of the sample's electron density, which can be reconstructed efficiently but lacks any depth information. In cases where the diffracted signal can be measured up to scattering angles exceeding ∼10°,

Indexed as

approximate methodscoherent diffraction imaginghigh-performance computingmulti-slice Fourier transformwide-angle scattering

Identifiers

PMID36249495
PMCPMC9533759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.