Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249244›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings.

Sarah L McGuinness, Johnson Josphin, Owen Eades, Sharon Clifford, Jane Fisher, Maggie Kirkman, Grant Russell, Carol L Hodgson, Helen L Kelsall, Riki Lane and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah L McGuinnessSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Johnson JosphinSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Owen EadesSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sharon CliffordSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jane FisherSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Maggie KirkmanSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Grant RussellSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Carol L HodgsonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Helen L KelsallSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Riki LaneSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Helen SkouterisSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Karen L SmithSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Karin LederSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Monash University · AUAlfred Health · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Organizational responses that support healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigate health risks are necessary to offset the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to understand how HCWs and key personnel working in healthcare settings in Melbourne, Australia perceived their employing organizations' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: In this qualitative study, conducted May-July 2021 as part of the longitudinal Coronavirus in Victorian Healthcare and Aged Care Workers (COVIC-HA) study, we purposively sampled and interviewed HCWs and key personnel from healthcare organizations across hospital, ambulance, aged care and primary care (general practice) settings. We also examined HCWs' free-text responses to a question about organizational resources and/or supports from the COVIC-HA Study's baseline survey. We thematically analyzed data using an iterative process. Results: We analyzed data from interviews with 28 HCWs and 21 key personnel and free-text responses from 365 HCWs, yielding three major themes: Conclusions: This study provides in-depth insights into the challenges and successes of organizational responses across four healthcare settings in the uncertain environment of a pandemic. Future efforts to mitigate the impact of acute stressors on HCWs should include a strong focus on bidirectional communication, effective and realistic strategies to strengthen and sustain the healthcare workforce, and greater investment in flexible and meaningful psychological support and wellbeing initiatives for HCWs.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentVictoriaCOVID-19healthcare workersmental healthoccupational healthpandemicperceptionsworkplace responses

Identifiers

PMID36249244
PMCPMC9557753
OpenAlexW4298000232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.