Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249084›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2022

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis of observational studies.

Kayeong Shin, Jiwoo Yang, Yeuni Yu, Eunjeong Son, Kihun Kim, Yun Hak Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for ovarian cancer? - a new adjuvant option or a silent trap.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Impact of ramipril nitroso-metabolites on cancer incidence - in silico and in vitro safety evaluation.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kayeong ShinDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jiwoo YangDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Yeuni YuBiomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Eunjeong SonDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Kihun KimDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan 49267, Republic of Korea.
Yun Hak KimDepartment of Anatomy and Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-8266
Pusan National University · KRKosin University Gospel Hospital · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRPusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Debate on the association between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the risk of developing cancer has been ongoing for decades. This study aimed to generate reliable results by analysing observational studies published in the decade after our last meta-analysis was conducted. Methods: We searched Embase and Medline databases on 21 January 2021 for cohort and case-control studies. Two researchers independently reviewed the literature and assessed the title and abstract of each publication. The I2 statistic used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the effect measures. Risk of bias was qualitatively assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results and discussion: We included an additional 16 cohort, 6 nested case-control, and 9 conventional case-control studies in the updated analysis. Overall HRs decreased, while overall relative risks increased. Conclusion: Our results show some protective effects through the hazard ratio and some detrimental effects through the relative risk. Large-scale investigations of cohorts followed up for decades are needed to clarify association. Plain Language Summary:

Indexed as

angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorangiotensin receptor blockercancerhypertensionmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36249084
PMCPMC9554114
OpenAlexW4306669620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.