Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249081›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of digital humanities2022

Developing a sentence level fairness metric using word embeddings.

Ahmed Izzidien, Stephen Fitz, Peter Romero, Bao S Loe, David Stillwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of digital humanities, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed IzzidienThe Psychometrics Centre, Cambridge Judge Business School, The University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1AG UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0929-8064
Stephen FitzFaculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Peter RomeroGraduate School of Economics, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Bao S LoeThe Psychometrics Centre, Cambridge Judge Business School, The University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1AG UK.
David StillwellThe Psychometrics Centre, Cambridge Judge Business School, The University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1AG UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fairness is a principal social value that is observable in civilisations around the world. Yet, a fairness metric for digital texts that describe even a simple social interaction, e.g., 'The boy hurt the girl' has not been developed. We address this by employing word embeddings that use factors found in a new social psychology literature review on the topic. We use these factors to build fairness vectors. These vectors are used as sentence level measures, whereby each dimension reflects a fairness component. The approach is employed to approximate human perceptions of fairness. The method leverages a pro-social bias within word embeddings, for which we obtain an F1 = 79.8 on a list of sentences using the Universal Sentence Encoder (USE). A second approach, using principal component analysis (PCA) and machine learning (ML), produces an F1 = 86.2. Repeating these tests using Sentence Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (SBERT) produces an F1 = 96.9 and F1 = 100 respectively. Improvements using subspace representations are further suggested. By proposing a first-principles approach, the paper contributes to the analysis of digital texts along an ethical dimension.

Indexed as

Digitisation of human valuesNLPSocial metrics for textsText analysis

Identifiers

PMID36249081
PMCPMC9549858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.