ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Fully automated detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer on MR images using a cascaded convolutional neural network.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-aided diagnostic performance for prostate MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-derived transition zone PSA density as a triage tool to reduce unnecessary prostate systematic biopsies in MRI-negative men.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Application and prospect of artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging of prostate cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence in MRI-Guided Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Addressing Key Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic value of [Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Algorithms for classification of sequences and segmentation of prostate gland: an external validation study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Algorithms for classification of sequences and segmentation of prostate gland: an external validation study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Using an artificial intelligence model to detect and localize visible clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter external validation study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- AI-predicted mpMRI image features for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.International urology and nephrology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a cascaded deep learning model trained with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) for fully automated detection and localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Methods: This retrospective study included 347 consecutive patients (235 csPCa, 112 non-csPCa) with high-quality prostate MRI data, which were randomly selected for training, validation, and testing. The ground truth was obtained using manual csPCa lesion segmentation, according to pathological results. The proposed cascaded model based on Res-UNet takes prostate MR images (T2WI+ADC or only ADC) as inputs and automatically segments the whole prostate gland, the anatomic zones, and the csPCa region step by step. The performance of the models was evaluated and compared with PI-RADS (version 2.1) assessment using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) in the held-out test set. Results: In the test set, the per-lesion sensitivity of the biparametric (ADC + T2WI) model, ADC model, and PI-RADS assessment were 95.5% (84/88), 94.3% (83/88), and 94.3% (83/88) respectively (all p > 0.05). Additionally, the mean DSC based on the csPCa lesions were 0.64 ± 0.24 and 0.66 ± 0.23 for the biparametric model and ADC model, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the biparametric model were 95.6% (108/113), 91.5% (665/727), and 92.0% (773/840) based on sextant, and were 98.6% (68/69), 64.8% (46/71), and 81.4% (114/140) based on patients. The biparametric model had a similar performance to PI-RADS assessment (p > 0.05) and had higher specificity than the ADC model (86.8% [631/727], p< 0.001) based on sextant. Conclusion: The cascaded deep learning model trained with ADC and T2WI achieves good performance for automated csPCa detection and localization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.