Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249046›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Intermittent MEK inhibition for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.

Shaheer Khan, Sapna P Patel, Alexander N Shoushtari, Grazia Ambrosini, Serge Cremers, Shing Lee, Lauren Franks, Shahnaz Singh-Kandah, Susana Hernandez, Naomi Sender and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Potential of Nanoparticle-Based Phototherapies for Future Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Pathological and Molecular Diagnosis of Uveal Melanoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shaheer KhanDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Sapna P PatelDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Alexander N ShoushtariDepartment of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Grazia AmbrosiniDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Serge CremersDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Shing LeeMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Lauren FranksMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Shahnaz Singh-KandahDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Susana HernandezDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Naomi SenderDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Kristina VuoloDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Alexandra NessonDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Prabhjot MundiDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Benjamin IzarDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Gary K SchwartzDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Richard D CarvajalDepartment of Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Uveal melanoma (UM) is associated with poor outcomes in the metastatic setting and harbors activating mutations resulting in upregulation of MAPK signaling in almost all cases. The efficacy of selumetinib, an oral allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/2, was limited when administered at a continual dosing schedule of 75 mg BID. Preclinical studies demonstrate that intermittent MEK inhibition reduces compensatory pathway activation and promotes T cell activation. We hypothesized that intermittent dosing of selumetinib would reduce toxicity, allow for the administration of increased doses, and achieve more complete pathway inhibition, thus resulting in improved antitumor activity. Methods: We conducted a phase Ib trial of selumetinib using an intermittent dosing schedule in patients with metastatic UM. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included assessment of the overall response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumor biopsies were collected at baseline, on day 3 (on treatment), and between days 11-14 (off treatment) from 9 patients for pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments. Results: 29 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of selumetinib across 4 dose levels (DL; DL1: 100 mg BID; DL2: 125 mg BID; DL3: 150 mg BID; DL4: 175 mg BID). All patients experienced a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), with 5/29 (17%) developing a grade 3 or higher TRAE. Five dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed: 2/20 in DL2, 2/5 in DL3, 1/1 in DL4. The estimated MTD was 150 mg BID (DL3), with an estimated probability of toxicity of 29% (90% probability interval 16%-44%). No responses were observed; 11/29 patients achieved a best response of stable disease (SD). The median PFS and OS were 1.8 months (95% CI 1.7, 4.5) and 7.1 months (95% CI 5.3, 11.5). PD analysis demonstrated at least partial pathway inhibition in all samples at day 3, with reactivation between days 11-14 in 7 of those cases. Conclusions: We identified 150 mg BID as the MTD of intermittent selumetinib, representing a 100% increase over the continuous dose MTD (75 mg BID). However, no significant clinical efficacy was observed using this dosing schedule.

Indexed as

intermittent dosingMEK inhibitionmetastaticselumetinibuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID36249046
PMCPMC9557946
OpenAlexW4298005089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.