Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249042›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for bone metastasis from lung cancer: A large population-based study.

Weihua Li, Zixiang Guo, Zehui Zou, Momen Alswadeh, Heng Wang, Xuqiang Liu, Xiaofeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weihua LiDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zixiang GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zehui ZouDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Momen AlswadehDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Heng WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xuqiang LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bone is one of the most common metastatic sites of advanced lung cancer, and the median survival time is significantly shorter than that of patients without metastasis. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with survival and construct a practical nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) in lung cancer patients with bone metastasis (BM). Methods: We extracted the patients with BM from lung cancer between 2011 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for OS. The variables screened by multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to construct the prognostic nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, concordance index (C-index), and calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess its clinical applicability. Results: A total of 7861 patients were included in this study and were randomly divided into training (n=5505) and validation (n=2356) cohorts using R software in a ratio of 7:3. Cox regression analysis showed that age, sex, race, grade, tumor size, histological type, T stage, N stage, surgery, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS. The C-index was 0.723 (95% CI: 0.697-0.749) in the training cohorts and 0.738 (95% CI: 0.698-0.778) in the validation cohorts. The AUC of both the training cohorts and the validation cohorts at 3-month (0.842 vs 0.859), 6-month (0.793 vs 0.814), and 1-year (0.776 vs 0.788) showed good predictive performance, and the calibration curves also demonstrated the reliability and stability of the model. Conclusions: The nomogram associated with the prognosis of BM from lung cancer was a reliable and practical tool, which could provide risk assessment and clinical decision-making for individualized treatment of patients.

Indexed as

bone metastasislung cancernomogramprognosisSEER database

Identifiers

PMID36249042
PMCPMC9561801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.